Protected areas offer refuge from invasive species spreading under climate change
Open accessAbstract
Protected areas (PAs) are intended to provide native biodiversity and habitats with a refuge against the impacts of global change, particularly acting as natural filters against biological invasions. In practice, however, it is unknown how effective PAs will be in shielding native species from invasions under projected climate change. Here, we investigate the current and future potential distributions of 100 of the most invasive terrestrial, freshwater, and marine species in Europe. We use this information to evaluate the combined threat posed by climate change and invasions to existing PAs and the most susceptible species they shelter. We found that only a quarter of Europe's marine and terrestrial areas protected over the last 100 years have been colonized by any of the invaders investigated, despite offering climatically suitable conditions for invasion. In addition, hotspots of invasive species and the most susceptible native species to their establishment do not match at large continental scales. Furthermore, the predicted richness of invaders is 11%-18% significantly lower inside PAs than outside them. Invasive species are rare in long-established national parks and nature reserves, which are actively protected and often located in remote and pristine regions with very low human density. In contrast, the richness of invasive species is high in the more recently designated Natura 2000 sites, which are subject to high human accessibility. This situation may change in the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Europe, predicted richness of invasive alien species was 11-18% lower inside than outside protected areas.
“They found that the predicted richness of IAS was 11–18% lower inside than outside protected areas.”
From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Gallardo et al., 2017
Protected areas can provide strategic refugia for native species from invasions spreading under climate change.
“They concluded that protected areas can provide strategic refugia for native species and recommended prioritizing actions to protect them from incursions of IAS spreading under climate change.”
From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Gallardo et al., 2017
Cites
The art of modelling range-shifting species: <i>The art of modelling range-shifting species</i>
Elith, J., Kearney, M., & Phillips, S. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00036.x · Cited by 2,813 · see citing works
Accelerating extinction risk from climate change
Urban, M. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4984 · Cited by 2,436 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
Pyšek, P., Hulme, P. E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Carlton, J. T., Dawson, W., Essl, F., Foxcroft, L. C., Genovesi, P., et al. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12627 · Cited by 2,234 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gallardo, B., Aldridge, D. C., González‐Moreno, P., Pergl, J., Pizarro, M., Pyšek, P., Thuiller, W., Yesson, C., & Vilà, M.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES)
- Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institute of Zoology London Zoological Society London UK
- Corresponding author
- Gallardo, Belinda
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5331-5343
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2742119399
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Grantová Agentura České Republiky (14‐36079G)
- Akademie Věd České Republiky (RVO 67985939)
- Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (CGL2009‐7515, CGL2014‐55145‐R, CGL2015‐65346R, JCI‐2012‐11908, SEV‐2012‐0262)
- Seventh Framework Programme
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- protected areas, biological invasions, invasive species, climate change, species distribution modeling, Natura 2000, national parks, range shifts, native biodiversity conservation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Europe, Humans, Human Activities, Models, Biological, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Introduced Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review