Cited by 81Parasite Biology and Host InteractionsZoonotic diseases and public healthHelminth infection and control

Global Spread of Helminth Parasites at the Human–Domestic Animal–Wildlife Interface

Open access
Wells, Konstans, Gibson, David I., Clark, Nicholas J., Ribas, Alexis, Morand, Serge, McCallum, Hamish I.·2018·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Changes in species distributions open novel parasite transmission routes at the human–wildlife interface, yet the strength of biotic and biogeographical factors that prevent or facilitate parasite host shifting are not well understood. We investigated global patterns of helminth parasite (Nematoda, Cestoda, Trematoda) sharing between mammalian wildlife species and domestic mammal hosts (including humans) using >24,000 unique country‐level records of host–parasite associations. We used hierarchical modelling and species trait data to determine possible drivers of the level of parasite sharing between wildlife species and either humans or domestic animal hosts. We found the diet of wildlife species to be a strong predictor of levels of helminth parasite sharing with humans and domestic animals, followed by a moderate effect of zoogeographical region and minor effects of species’ habitat and climatic niches. Combining model predictions with the distribution and ecological profile data of wildlife species, we projected global risk maps that uncovered strikingly similar patterns of wildlife parasite sharing across geographical areas for the different domestic host species (including humans). These similarities are largely explained by the fact that widespread parasites are commonly recorded infecting several domestic species. If the dietary profile and position in the trophic chain of a wildlife species largely drives its level of helminth parasite sharing with humans/domestic animals, future range shifts of host species that result in novel trophic interactions may likely increase parasite host shifting and have important ramifications for human and animal health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.14064

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eukaryotic parasites are already known to infect human hosts following the wildlife-domestic pet-human transmission network.

    “Indeed, eukaryotic parasites are already known to infect human hosts following the wildlife–domestic pet–human transmission network (Wells et al. 2018).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Wells et al. 2018

    The Roles of domestic animal hosts section (p. 23) reports that humans and dogs share many helminth parasites with wildlife, supporting the claim that these parasites infect human hosts at this interface. But the paper does not establish transmission along a wildlife–pet–human route: it says its analysis cannot determine the direction of host shifts (p. 24). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wells, K., Gibson, D. I., Clark, N. J., Ribas, A., Morand, S., & McCallum, H. I.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • CIRAD ASTRE CNRS ISEM Faculty of Veterinary Technology Kasetsart University Bangkok Thailand
Corresponding author
Wells, Konstans
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-13
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
3254-3265
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2790257300
Cited by
81
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
helminths, human-wildlife interface, domestic animals, wildlife parasites, host-parasite interactions, trophic position, species distribution, nematodes, cestodes, trematodes
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Animals, Wild, Diet, Ecology, Helminthiasis, Helminths, Host-Parasite Interactions, Humans, Models, Statistical, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review