Prolonged tropical forest degradation due to compounding disturbances: Implications for CO 2 and H 2 O fluxes
Abstract
Drought, fire, and windstorms can interact to degrade tropical forests and the ecosystem services they provide, but how these forests recover after catastrophic disturbance events remains relatively unknown. Here, we analyze multi‐year measurements of vegetation dynamics and function (fluxes of CO 2 and H 2 O) in forests recovering from 7 years of controlled burns, followed by wind disturbance. Located in southeast Amazonia, the experimental forest consists of three 50‐ha plots burned annually, triennially, or not at all from 2004 to 2010. During the subsequent 6‐year recovery period, postfire tree survivorship and biomass sharply declined, with aboveground C stocks decreasing by 70%–94% along forest edges (0–200 m into the forest) and 36%–40% in the forest interior. Vegetation regrowth in the forest understory triggered partial canopy closure (70%–80%) from 2010 to 2015. The composition and spatial distribution of grasses invading degraded forest evolved rapidly, likely because of the delayed mortality. Four years after the experimental fires ended (2014), the burned plots assimilated 36% less carbon than the Control, but net CO 2 exchange and evapotranspiration (ET) had fully recovered 7 years after the experimental fires ended (2017). Carbon uptake recovery occurred largely in response to increased light‐use efficiency and reduced postfire respiration, whereas increased water use associated with postfire growth of new recruits and remaining trees explained the recovery in ET. Although the effects of interacting disturbances (e.g., fires, forest fragmentation, and blowdown events) on mortality and biomass persist over many years, the rapid recovery of carbon and water fluxes can help stabilize local climate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In stable forest regions of the Amazon with annual rainfall above 1,800 mm, forest cover usually recovers within a few years or decades after disturbances, yet forest composition and functioning may remain degraded for decades or centuries.
“In stable forest regions of the Amazon with annual rainfall above 1,800 mm (Extended Data Fig. 1b), forest cover usually recovers within a few years or decades after disturbances, yet forest composition and functioning may remain degraded for decades or centuries84–87.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
In the degraded forest trajectory, feedbacks often involve competition between trees and other opportunistic plants, as well as interactions between deforestation, fire and seed limitation.
“In the ‘degraded forest’ trajectory, feedbacks often involve competition between trees and other opportunistic plants85,90,92, as well as interactions between deforestation, fire and seed limitation84,87,105.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Cites
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013
Jolly, W. M., Cochrane, M. A., Freeborn, P. H., Holden, Z. A., Brown, T. J., Williamson, G. J., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8537 · Cited by 2,200 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system
Flores, B. M., Montoya, E., Sakschewski, B., Nascimento, N., Staal, A., Betts, R. A., Levis, C., Lapola, D. M., Esquível-Muelbert, A., Jakovac, C., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brando, P. M., Silvério, D., Maracahipes‐Santos, L., Oliveira‐Santos, C., Levick, S. R., Coe, M. T., Migliavacca, M., Balch, J. K., Macedo, M. N., Nepstad, D. C., Maracahipes, L., Davidson, E., Asner, G., Kolle, O., & Trumbore, S.
- Affiliations
- Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Earth Innovation Institute San Francisco California
- University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brando, Paulo M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-06-25
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2855-2868
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2955343018
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (441703/2016-0, 460494/2014-7)
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Division of Environmental Biology (1146206)
- National Science Foundation (1146206)
- Borders (405800)
- United States Agency for International Development
- U.S. Department of State
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
- U.S. Forest Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- tropical forest degradation, compound disturbances, fire disturbance, wind disturbance, post-fire recovery, carbon flux, water flux, evapotranspiration, net CO2 exchange, aboveground biomass, tree mortality, light use efficiency, grass invasion, canopy closure, Amazon rainforest, climate stabilization
- MeSH terms
- Brazil, Carbon Dioxide, Fires, Trees, Ecosystem, Forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review