The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exposure to ultraviolet‐B radiation increases the susceptibility of mosquitoes to infection with dengue virus
Open accessAbstract
By 2100, greenhouse gases are predicted to reduce ozone and cloud cover over the tropics causing increased exposure of organisms to harmful ultraviolet‐B radiation (UVBR). UVBR damages DNA and is an important modulator of immune function and disease susceptibility in humans and other vertebrates. The effect of UVBR on invertebrate immune function is largely unknown, but UVBR together with ultraviolet‐A radiation impairs an insect immune response that utilizes melanin, a pigment that also protects against UVBR‐induced DNA damage. If UVBR weakens insect immunity, then it may make insect disease vectors more susceptible to infection with pathogens of socioeconomic and public health importance. In the tropics, where UVBR is predicted to increase, the mosquito‐borne dengue virus (DENV), is prevalent and a growing threat to humans. We therefore examined the effect of UVBR on the mosquito Aedes aegypti, the primary vector for DENV, to better understand the potential implications of increased tropical UVBR for mosquito‐borne disease risk. We found that exposure to a UVBR dose that caused significant larval mortality approximately doubled the probability that surviving females would become infected with DENV, despite this UVBR dose having no effect on the expression of an effector gene involved in antiviral immunity. We also found that females exposed to a lower UVBR dose were more likely to have low fecundity even though this UVBR dose had no effect on larval size or activity, pupal cuticular melanin content, or adult mass, metabolic rate, or flight capacity. We conclude that future increases in tropical UVBR associated with anthropogenic global change may have the benefit of reducing mosquito‐borne disease risk for humans by reducing mosquito fitness, but this benefit may be eroded if it also makes mosquitoes more likely to be infected with deadly pathogens.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surviving female mosquitoes that were fed blood containing the dengue virus were much more likely to carry the dengue virus (92% infected) than females that were exposed to UV-A radiation (62%) or visible radiation only (42%).
“The surviving females that were fed blood containing the dengue virus were much more likely to carry the dengue virus (92% infected) than females that were exposed to UV-A radiation (62%) or visible radiation only (42%) [235].”
Daily exposure (3 h) to UV-B + UV-A + visible radiation at low irradiance (UV Index of 1.6) from a full spectrum lamp caused high mortality of developing mosquito larvae.
“Daily exposure (3 h) to UV-B + UV-A + visible radiation at low irradiance (UV Index of 1.6) from a full spectrum lamp caused high mortality of developing mosquito larvae (Fig. 11; [235].”
The viral load of dengue in females that developed from larvae exposed to full spectrum radiation (including UV-B) was lower than for those only exposed to visible radiation.
“However, the viral load of dengue in the females that developed from larvae exposed to full spectrum radiation (including UV-B) was lower than for those only exposed to visible radiation.”
Citations
Cites
Photoimmunology: how ultraviolet radiation affects the immune system
Bernard, J. J., Gallo, R. L., & Krutmann, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0185-9 · Cited by 329
Ozone—climate interactions and effects on solar ultraviolet radiation
Bais, A. F., Bernhard, G., McKenzie, R. L., Aucamp, P. J., Young, P. J., Ilyas, M., Jöckel, P., & Deushi, M. (2019) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/c8pp90059k · Cited by 206
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 65
- 10.1126/science.1239401 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365‐2435.13663 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐2435.2011.01900.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11160‐020‐09603‐1 · DOI
- 10.18637/jss.v081.i12 · DOI
- 10.1039/c0pp90035d · DOI
- 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0240261 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12060 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1365‐2435.14209 · DOI
- 10.32614/RJ-2017-066 · DOI
- 10.1111/php.12368 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/conphys/cow037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pt.2005.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0604875103 · DOI
- 10.1093/conphys/coy035 · DOI
- 10.1093/conphys/coac038 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.128769 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365‐2435.12435 · DOI
- 10.5194/acp‐18‐8409‐2018 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/36/3/001 · DOI
- 10.3390/atmos11030228 · DOI
- Fox J., 2011, An R companion to applied regression
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0013398 · DOI
- Friedberg E. C., 2006, DNA repair and mutagenesis
- 10.1086/680362 · DOI
- 10.1603/0022‐2585‐40.6.903 · DOI
- 10.1029/2009JD012219 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467‐020‐16010‐4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744‐7348.2011.00483.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.164830 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564‐019‐0376‐y · DOI
- 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5194/acp‐19‐10087‐2019 · DOI
- Lighton J. R. B., 2019, Measuring metabolic rates: A manual for scientists
- 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1466‐8238.2012.00784.x · DOI
- 10.1111/evo.12122 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.017 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598‐019‐48625‐z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/2016gl067997 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.042 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13071‐019‐3792‐1 · DOI
- 10.2147/CLEP.S34440 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008218 · DOI
- 10.1111/geb.12552 · DOI
- R Core Team, 2022, R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.2.0)
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002977 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr0204348 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s13355‐013‐0219‐x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0905006106 · DOI
- State of the Tropics, 2019, Health in the tropics
- 10.1186/s13071‐017‐2589‐3 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep43847 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.10.031 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2019.2075 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365‐2915.2008.00783.x · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj.6133 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140‐6736(16)31012‐1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1461‐0248.2001.00279.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.01510 · DOI
- 10.1111/exd.14260 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neale, P. J., Hylander, S., Banaszak, A. T., Häder, D.-P., Rose, K. C., Vione, D., Wängberg, S.-Å., Jansen, M. A. K., Busquets, R., Andersen, M. P. S., et al. (2025) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43630-025-00687-x · Cited by 32
“[235].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Alton, L. A., Novelo, M., Beaman, J. E., Arnold, P. A., Bywater, C. L., Kerton, E. J., Lombardi, E. J., Koh, C., & McGraw, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alton, Lesley A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-08-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5540-5551
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W4385716027
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP180103925, DP220103553)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Keywords
- UV-B radiation, dengue virus, Aedes aegypti, mosquito susceptibility to infection, antiviral immunity, melanin, mosquito fecundity, mosquito-borne disease risk, climate change, ozone depletion, global change
- MeSH terms
- Mosquito Vectors, Aedes, Animals, Dengue, Dengue Virus, Female, Humans, Larva, Melanins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review