Nitrogen and harvest effects on soil properties under rainfed switchgrass and no‐till corn over 9 years: implications for soil quality
Abstract
Nitrogen fertilizer and harvest management will alter soils under bioenergy crop production and the long‐term effects of harvest timing and residue removal remain relatively unknown. Compared to no‐tilled corn (NT‐C, Zea mays L.), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is predicted to improve soil properties [i.e. soil organic C (SOC), soil microbial biomass (SMB‐C), and soil aggregation] due to its perennial nature and deep‐rooted growth form, but few explicit field comparisons exist. We assessed soil properties over 9 years for a rainfed study of N fertilizer rate (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg N ha−1) and harvest management on switchgrass (harvested in August and postfrost) and NT‐C (with and without 50% stover removal) in eastern NE. We measured SOC, aggregate stability, SMB‐C, bulk density (BD), pH, P and K in the top 0–30 cm. Both NT‐C and switchgrass increased SMB‐C, SOC content, and aggregate stability over the 9 years, reflecting improvement from previous conventional management. However, the soils under switchgrass had double the percent aggregate stability, 1.3 times more microbial biomass, and a 5–8% decrease in bulk density in the 0–5 and 5–10 cm depths compared to NT‐C. After 9 years, cumulative decrease in available P was significantly greater beneath NT‐C (−24.0 kg P ha−1) compared to switchgrass (−5.4 kg P ha−1). When all measured soil parameters were included in the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF), switchgrass improved soil quality index over time (Δ SQI) in all depths. NT‐C without residue removal did not affect Δ SQI, but 50% residue removal decreased Δ SQI (0–30 cm) due to reduced aggregate stability and SMB‐C. Even with best‐management practices such as NT, corn stover removal will have to be carefully managed to prevent soil degradation. Long‐term N and harvest management studies that include biological, chemical, and physical soil measurements are necessary to accurately assess bioenergy impacts on soils.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Other researchers have found that both switchgrass (Liebig et al., 2005, 2008; Schmer et al., 2011) and NT-C (see references in West & Post, 2002) can sequester soil C after conversion from conventional cropping systems (Robertson et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1945 · Cited by 1,341 · cited 9× · see citing works
“We then use the Soil Management Assessment Framework to integrate these measured soil variables into an indicator of soil quality and assess the relative impact of these practices (Andrews et al., 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS
Adler, P. R., Grosso, S. J. D., & Parton, W. J. (2007) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/05-2018 · Cited by 652 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Accounting for agricultural management practices is crucial to accurately predict future effects of biomass removal on GHG flux and soil properties, including SOC (Adler et al., 2007; Robertson et al., 2011; Follett et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSwitchgrass Biomass Production in the Midwest USA: Harvest and Nitrogen Management
Vogel, K. P., Brejda, J. J., Walters, D. T., & Buxton, D. R. (2002) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2002.0413 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil carbon under switchgrass stands and cultivated cropland
Liebig, M. A., Johnson, H. A., Hanson, J. D., & Frank, A. B. (2005) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.004 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Soil Carbon Storage by Switchgrass Grown for Bioenergy
Liebig, M. A., Schmer, M. R., Vogel, K. P., & Mitchell, R. B. (2008) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-008-9019-5 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of corn and switchgrass on marginal soils for bioenergy
Varvel, G. E., Vogel, K. P., Mitchell, R. B., Follett, R. F., & Kimble, J. M. (2008) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.07.003 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationNitrogen influences biomass and nutrient partitioning by perennial, warm-season grasses
Heggenstaller, A. H., Moore, K. J., Liebman, M., & Anex, R. P. (2009) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0225x · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chimento, C., Almagro, M., & Amaducci, S. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12232 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Blanco‐Canqui, H., Mitchell, R. B., Jin, V. L., Schmer, M. R., & Eskridge, K. M. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12436 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Stewart, C. E., Follett, R. F., Pruessner, E. G., Varvel, G. E., Vogel, K. P., & Mitchell, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stewart, Catherine E.
- Venue
- GCB Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 288-301
- ISSN
- 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-1707
- OpenAlex
- W2012122653
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 15.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- switchgrass, no-till corn, nitrogen fertilization, harvest management, soil organic carbon, soil microbial biomass carbon, soil aggregate stability, bulk density, soil quality index, Soil Management Assessment Framework, energy crops, rainfed agriculture, phosphorus depletion, soil quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review