The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The spatial scaling of beta diversity
Open accessAbstract
Beta diversity is an important concept used to describe turnover in species composition across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, and it underpins much of conservation theory and practice. Although substantial progress has been made in the mathematical and terminological treatment of different measures of beta diversity, there has been little conceptual synthesis of potential scale dependence of beta diversity with increasing spatial grain and geographic extent of sampling. Here, we evaluate different conceptual approaches to the spatial scaling of beta diversity, interpreted from ‘fixed’ and ‘varying’ perspectives of spatial grain and extent. We argue that a ‘sliding window’ perspective, in which spatial grain and extent covary, is an informative way to conceptualize community differentiation across scales. This concept more realistically reflects the varying empirical approaches that researchers adopt in field sampling and the varying scales of landscape perception by different organisms. Scale dependence in beta diversity has broad implications for emerging fields in ecology and biogeography, such as the integration of fine-resolution ecogenomic data with large-scale macroecological studies, as well as for guiding appropriate management responses to threats to biodiversity operating at different spatial scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,931
Species diversity in space and time
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2720 · Cited by 4,573
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity
Baselga, A. (2010) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x · Cited by 3,974
Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California
Whittaker, R. H. (1960) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1943563 · Cited by 3,939
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
Wiens, J. A. (1989) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2389612 · Cited by 3,689
Anderson, M. J., Crist, T. O., Chase, J. M., Vellend, M., Inouye, B. D., Freestone, A. L., Sanders, N. J., Cornell, H. V., Comita, L. S., Davies, K. F., et al. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x · Cited by 2,492
PARTITIONING DIVERSITY INTO INDEPENDENT ALPHA AND BETA COMPONENTS
Jost, L. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-1736.1 · Cited by 2,265
Colwell, R. K., Chao, A., Gotelli, N. J., Lin, S.-Y., Mao, C. X., Chazdon, R. L., & Longino, J. T. (2012) · Journal of Plant Ecology · doi:10.1093/jpe/rtr044 · Cited by 1,921
Cited by
Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Contu, S., Hill, S. L. L., Beck, J., Liu, Y., Meyer, C., Phillips, H. R. P., Scharlemann, J. P. W., & Purvis, A. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006841 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Barton, P. S., Cunningham, S. A., Manning, A. D., Gibb, H., Lindenmayer, D. B., & Didham, R. K.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-28
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 639-647
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1555589744
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spatial scaling of beta diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geb.12031
- The paper
- Barton, P. S., Cunningham, S. A., Manning, A. D., Gibb, H., Lindenmayer, D. B., & Didham, R. K. (2013). The spatial scaling of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.