Cited by 287Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Widespread winners and narrow-ranged losers: Land use homogenizes biodiversity in local assemblages worldwide

Open access
Newbold, Tim, Hudson, Lawrence N., Contu, Sara, Hill, Samantha L. L., Beck, Jan, Liu, Yunhui, Meyer, Carsten, Phillips, Helen R. P. +2 more·2018·PLOS Biology

Abstract

Human use of the land (for agriculture and settlements) has a substantial negative effect on biodiversity globally. However, not all species are adversely affected by land use, and indeed, some benefit from the creation of novel habitat. Geographically rare species may be more negatively affected by land use than widespread species, but data limitations have so far prevented global multi-clade assessments of land-use effects on narrow-ranged and widespread species. We analyse a large, global database to show consistent differences in assemblage composition. Compared with natural habitat, assemblages in disturbed habitats have more widespread species on average, especially in urban areas and the tropics. All else being equal, this result means that human land use is homogenizing assemblage composition across space. Disturbed habitats show both reduced abundances of narrow-ranged species and increased abundances of widespread species. Our results are very important for biodiversity conservation because narrow-ranged species are typically at higher risk of extinction than widespread species. Furthermore, the shift to more widespread species may also affect ecosystem functioning by reducing both the contribution of rare species and the diversity of species' responses to environmental changes among local assemblages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006841

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of declining endemic species and the spread of already widespread species drives 'biotic homogenization', a convergence of biological communities across regions.

    “This combination of declining endemic species and the spread of already widespread species as humans purposefully or unwittingly transport species around the world drives ' biotic homogenization ' ( 45 , 46 ), a convergence of biological communities across regions that blurs the patterns on life ' s rich tapestry.”

    From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results and Discussion report that narrow-ranged species decline while already widespread species increase in abundance under human land use, leading to more similar terrestrial assemblages. The paper does not establish the citing sentence’s additional mechanism that humans transport those species around the world. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Contu, S., Hill, S. L. L., Beck, J., Liu, Y., Meyer, C., Phillips, H. R. P., Scharlemann, J. P. W., & Purvis, A.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Newbold, Tim
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2018-12-04
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
e2006841
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2903542802
Cited by
287
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27
FWCI
20.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Royal Society (UF150526)
  • Imperial College London
  • Volkswagen Foundation (0066354)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/J011193/2, NE/M014533/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
land use, widespread species, assemblage composition, habitat disturbance, urbanization, tropical habitats, extinction risk, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem functioning
MeSH terms
Natural Resources, Agriculture, Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Ecosystem, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review