Cited by 203Forest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global relationship of wood and leaf litter decomposability: the role of functional traits within and across plant organs

Abstract

Aim: Recent meta‐analyses have revealed that plant traits and their phylogenetic history influence decay rates of dead wood and leaf litter, but it remains unknown if decay rates of wood and litter covary over a wide range of tree species and across ecosystems. We evaluated the relationships between species‐specific wood and leaf litter decomposability, as well as between wood and leaf traits that control their respective decomposability. Location: Global. Methods: We compiled data on rates of wood and leaf litter decomposition for 324 and 635 tree species, respectively, and data on six functional traits for both organs. We used hierarchical Bayesian meta‐analysis to estimate, for the first time, species‐specific values for wood and leaf litter decomposability standardized to reference conditions ( k * wood and k * leaf ) across the globe. With these data, we evaluated the relationships: (1) between wood and leaf traits, (2) between each k * and the selected traits within and across organs, and (3) between wood and leaf k *. Results: Across all species k * wood and k * leaf were positively correlated, phylogenetically clustered and correlated with plant functional traits within and across organs. k * of both organs was usually better described as a function of within‐ and cross‐organ traits, than of within‐organ traits alone. When analysed for angiosperms and gymnosperms separately, wood and leaf k * were no longer significantly correlated, but each k * was still significantly correlated to the functional traits. Main conclusions: We demonstrate important relationships among wood and leaf litter decomposability as after‐life effects of traits from the living plants. These functional traits influence the decomposability of senesced tissue which could potentially lead to alterations in the rates of biogeochemical cycling, depending on the phylogenetic structure of the species pool. These results provide crucial information for a better representation of decomposition rates in dynamic global vegetation models.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/geb.12172

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies found that decomposition rates of roots, stems, and wood of the same species are positively correlated with those of leaf litter.

    “Previous studies have found that the decomposition rates of roots, stems, and wood of the same species are positively correlated with those of leaf litter (46, 47)”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.2307/3546886 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01802.x · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01517.x · DOI
  4. 10.1139/b91-187 · DOI
  5. Berg B., 2008, Plant litter. Decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration
  6. 10.1007/BF00000785 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb00492.x · DOI
  8. 10.5194/bgd-8-8817-2011 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s004420050044 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01529.x · DOI
  11. 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2356:RAPVOW]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00430.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00383.x · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-94-011-0693-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01615.x · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00651.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01913.x · DOI
  20. 10.1038/250026a0 · DOI
  21. Grime J.P., 1979, Plant strategies and vegetation processes
  22. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01837.x · DOI
  23. 10.1146/annurev.py.19.090181.002253 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01861-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/978-3-0348-9385-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/joc.1276 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2307/2265777 · DOI
  29. 10.1139/x88-032 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/sim.3680 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1023/A:1009764705942 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/1936780 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00224.x · DOI
  34. Niklas K.J., 1992, Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function
  35. 10.1214/13-BA806 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/1932179 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16668.x · DOI
  38. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1801 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01324.x · DOI
  40. R Development Core Team, 2012, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  41. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01712.x · DOI
  42. 10.1890/06-1841 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01515.x · DOI
  44. Swift M.J., 1979, Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems, 10.1525/9780520407114 · DOI
  45. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00268.x · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01259.x · DOI
  47. 10.1007/978-3-540-92706-8_5 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x · DOI
  49. 10.1093/aob/mcl066 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pietsch, K. A., Ogle, K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Cornwell, W. K., Bönisch, G., Craine, J. M., Jackson, B. G., Kattge, J., Peltzer, D. A., Penuelas, J., Reich, P. B., Wardle, D. A., Weedon, J. T., Wright, I. J., Zanne, A. E., & Wirth, C.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
  • Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
  • CREAF Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193 Catalonia Spain
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Pietsch, Katherina A.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-13
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
1046-1057
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W1681418886
Cited by
203
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 2
FWCI
16.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 891)
  • Core funding for Crown Research Institutes from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employments Science and Innovation Group
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
wood decay, leaf litter decomposition, plant functional traits, decomposition rate, tree species, phylogenetic structure, flowering plants, gymnosperms, biogeochemical cycles, global vegetation models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review