Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short‐term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover

De Keersmaecker, Wanda, Lhermitte, Stef, Tits, Laurent, Honnay, Olivier, Somers, Ben, Coppin, Pol·2015·Global Ecology and Biogeography

Abstract

Aim: In order to mitigate the ecological, economical and social consequences of future climate change, we must understand and quantify the response of vegetation to short‐term climate anomalies. There is currently no model that quantifies vegetation resistance and resilience at a global scale while simultaneously taking climate variability into account. The goals of this study were therefore to develop a standardized indicator of short‐term vegetation resilience and resistance to drought and temperature anomalies, and to improve our understanding of vegetation resistance and resilience in drought‐sensitive areas by linking metrics of vegetation stability to the percentage of tree cover, non‐tree vegetation and bare soil. Location: Global. Methods: The deviation of vegetation behaviour from expectations was quantified using anomalies in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and modelled as a function of (1) past NDVI anomalies, (2) an instantaneous drought indicator and (3) temperature anomalies. Metrics of resistance and resilience were then extracted from the model and related to the percentages of bare soil, non‐tree vegetation and tree cover. Results: Comparisons of the globally derived resilience and resistance metrics showed low resilience and low resistance to drought in semi‐arid areas, low resistance to negative temperature anomalies in high‐latitude areas, and low resistance to positive temperature anomalies in the Sahel and A ustralia. In drought‐sensitive areas, resilience was highest for vegetation types with 3–20% bare soil and 5–15% tree cover. Main conclusions: Our ARx model is the first to simultaneously derive vegetation resistance and resilience metrics at a global scale, explicitly taking into account the spatial variability of short‐term climate anomalies and data reliability. Its results highlight the impact of tree cover, non‐tree vegetation and bare soil on vegetation resilience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/geb.12279

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
De Keersmaecker, W., Lhermitte, S., Tits, L., Honnay, O., Somers, B., & Coppin, P.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-02
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
539-548
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W1494272296
Cited by
283
References
39
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short‐term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geb.12279
The paper
De Keersmaecker, W., Lhermitte, S., Tits, L., Honnay, O., Somers, B., & Coppin, P. (2015). A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short‐term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.