The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Aim: The number of studies investigating the nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity has increased substantially, but our general understanding of the drivers of turnover and nestedness remains elusive. Here, we examined the effects of species traits, spatial extent, latitude and ecosystem type on the nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity. Location: Global. Time period: 1968–2017. Major taxa studied: From bacteria to mammals. Methods: From the 99 studies that partition total beta diversity into its turnover and nestedness components, we assembled 269 and 259 data points for the pairwise and multiple site beta‐diversity metrics, respectively. Our data covered a broad variation in species dispersal type, body size and trophic position. The data were from freshwater, marine and terrestrial realms, and encompassed geographical areas from the tropics to near polar regions. We used linear modelling as a meta‐regression tool to analyse the data. Results: Pairwise turnover, multiple site turnover and total beta diversity all decreased significantly with latitude. In contrast, multiple site nestedness showed a positive relationship with latitude. Beta‐diversity components did not generally differ among the realms. The turnover component and total beta diversity increased with spatial extent, whereas nestedness was scale invariant for pairwise metrics. Multiple site beta‐diversity components did not vary with spatial extent. Surprisingly, passively dispersed organisms had lower turnover and total beta diversity than flying organisms. Body size showed a relatively weak relationship with beta diversity but had important interactions with trophic position, thus also affecting beta diversity via interactive effects. Producers had significantly higher average pairwise turnover and total beta diversity than carnivores. Main conclusions: The present results provide evidence that species turnover, being consistently the larger component of total beta diversity, and nestedness are related to the latitude of the study area and intrinsic organismal features. We showed that two beta‐diversity components had generally opposing patterns with regard to latitude. We highlight that beta‐diversity partition may give additional insights into the underlying causes of spatial variability in biotic communities compared with total beta diversity alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi‐scale community ecology
Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J. M., Hoopes, M. F., Holt, R. D., Shurin, J. B., Law, R., Tilman, D., et al. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x · Cited by 5,391
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,784
Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity
Baselga, A. (2010) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x · Cited by 3,974
Global diversity and geography of soil fungi
Tedersoo, L., Bahram, M., Põlme, S., Kõljalg, U., Yorou, N. S., Wijesundera, R., Ruiz, L. V., Vasco-Palacios, A. M., Thu, P. Q., Suija, A., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1256688 · Cited by 3,702
Anderson, M. J., Crist, T. O., Chase, J. M., Vellend, M., Inouye, B. D., Freestone, A. L., Sanders, N. J., Cornell, H. V., Comita, L. S., Davies, K. F., et al. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x · Cited by 2,492
Latitudinal Gradients of Biodiversity: Pattern, Process, Scale, and Synthesis
Willig, M. R., Kaufman, D. M., & Stevens, R. D. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.012103.144032 · Cited by 2,163
On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient
Hillebrand, H. (2004) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/381004 · Cited by 2,085
The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology
Nekola, J. C., & White, P. S. (1999) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00305.x · Cited by 1,908
Global Dispersal of Free-Living Microbial Eukaryote Species
Finlay, B. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070710 · Cited by 1,825
Cited by
Hill, M. J., White, J. C., Biggs, J., Briers, R. A., Gledhill, D., Ledger, M. E., Thornhill, I., Wood, P. J., & Hassall, C. (2021) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.13239 · Cited by 80
Teurlincx, S., Verhofstad, M. J. J. M., Bakker, E. S., & Declerck, S. A. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01013 · Cited by 22
Sun, J., Doeser, A., Cao, Y., Lv, X., Li, W., & Liu, F. (2022) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103468 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Soininen, J., Heino, J., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-109
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-8238
- OpenAlex
- W2765597104
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 25.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geb.12660
- The paper
- Soininen, J., Heino, J., & Wang, J. (2018). A meta‐analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.