Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global estimates of the extent and production of macroalgal forests

Open access
Duarte, Carlos M., Gattuso, Jean‐Pierre, Hancke, Kasper, Gundersen, Hege, Filbee‐Dexter, Karen, Pedersen, Morten F., Middelburg, Jack J., Burrows, Michael T., Krumhansl, Kira A., Wernberg, Thomas, Moore, Pippa, Pessarrodona, Albert, Ørberg, Sarah B., Pinto, Isabel S., Assis, Jorge, Queirós, Ana M., Smale, Dan A., Bekkby, Trine, Serrão, Ester A., Krause‐Jensen, Dorte·2022·Global Ecology and Biogeography

Abstract

Aim: Macroalgal habitats are believed to be the most extensive and productive of all coastal vegetated ecosystems. In stark contrast to the growing attention on their contribution to carbon export and sequestration, understanding of their global extent and production is limited and these have remained poorly assessed for decades. Here we report a first data‐driven assessment of the global extent and production of macroalgal habitats based on modelled and observed distributions and net primary production (NPP) across habitat types. Location: Global coastal ocean. Time period: Contemporary. Major taxa studied: Macroalgae. Methods: Here we apply a comprehensive niche model to generate an improved global map of potential macroalgal distribution, constrained by incident light on the seafloor and substrate type. We compiled areal net primary production (NPP) rates across macroalgal habitats from the literature and combined this with our estimates of the global extent of these habitats to calculate global macroalgal NPP. Results: We show that macroalgal forests are a major biome with a global area of 6.06–7.22 million km 2, dominated by red algae, and NPP of 1.32 Pg C/year, dominated by brown algae. Main conclusions: The global macroalgal biome is comparable, in area and NPP, to the Amazon forest, but is globally distributed as a thin strip around shorelines. Macroalgae are expanding in polar, subpolar and tropical areas, where their potential extent is also largest, likely increasing the overall contribution of algal forests to global carbon sequestration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/geb.13515

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Duarte, C. M., Gattuso, J., Hancke, K., Gundersen, H., Filbee‐Dexter, K., Pedersen, M. F., Middelburg, J. J., Burrows, M. T., Krumhansl, K. A., Wernberg, T., Moore, P., Pessarrodona, A., Ørberg, S. B., Pinto, I. S., Assis, J., Queirós, A. M., Smale, D. A., Bekkby, T., Serrão, E. A., & Krause‐Jensen, D.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-05
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1422-1439
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W4229025788
Cited by
280
References
100
FWCI
24.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global estimates of the extent and production of macroalgal forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geb.13515
The paper
Duarte, C. M., Gattuso, J., Hancke, K., Gundersen, H., Filbee‐Dexter, K., Pedersen, M. F., Middelburg, J. J., Burrows, M. T., Krumhansl, K. A., Wernberg, T., Moore, P., Pessarrodona, A., Ørberg, S. B., Pinto, I. S., Assis, J., Queirós, A. M., Smale, D. A., Bekkby, T., Serrão, E. A., & Krause‐Jensen, D. (2022). Global estimates of the extent and production of macroalgal forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.