Cited by 14Pasture and Agricultural SystemsRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems

The effect of grazing intensity on the performance of high‐yielding dairy cows

Dale, A. J., Laidlaw, A. S., McGettrick, S., Gordon, A., Ferris, C. P.·2018·Grass and Forage Science

Abstract

The study evaluated the impact of High, Moderate and Low grazing intensities throughout the grazing season, within a rotational stocking system, on the performance of high‐yielding dairy cows receiving a high level of concentrates. Sixty‐three Holstein‐Friesian dairy cows, 21 at each grazing intensity, were rotationally grazed. Average paddock size, post‐grazing sward heights and seasonal grazing stocking rates within the High, Moderate and Low grazing intensities were 0.143, 0.167 and 0.200 hectares, 5.2, 6.1 and 6.8 cm and 7.8, 6.7 and 5.6 cows ha−1 respectively. Grazing intensity had no effect on milk fat and protein content, end‐of‐study body condition score or end‐of‐study live weight although the latter tended towards significance (p = .057). Average daily milk yield per cow was higher within the Low grazing intensity (33.2 kg day−1) than High grazing intensity (30.5 kg day−1), and average daily fat‐plus‐protein yield was higher for Low and Moderate than High. Milk output per hectare was higher for the High grazing intensity than Low grazing intensity (33,544 and 26,215 kg ha−1 respectively). Grazing intensity had no effect on grazing bite number, blood metabolites or concentrations of milk fatty acids or on sward morphological components, although dead matter increased with time across all grazing intensities. Herbage utilization efficiency (above 1,600 kg DM ha−1) was 52%, 74% and 87% for Low, Moderate and High respectively. It is concluded that high‐producing dairy cows can graze at high levels of utilization when they are receiving high rates of concentrates. Although cow performance will be reduced, milk yield per ha will increase.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gfs.12350

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soil C-sequestration potential in grasslands can only possibly cancel out a continuous flow of enteric CH4 emissions in rather extensive systems, mostly with a cattle density lower than one head per hectare.

    “The low values of cattle numbers in Fig. 3 indicate that soil C-sequestration potential in grasslands can only possibly cancel out a continuous flow of enteric CH4 emissions in rather extensive systems (mostly with a cattle density lower than one head per hectare), whereas the density in practice is generally much higher than that32,33.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dale, A. J., Laidlaw, A. S., McGettrick, S., Gordon, A., & Ferris, C. P.
Affiliations
Agri Food and Biosciences Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Laidlaw, A. S.
Venue
Grass and Forage Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
798-810
ISSN
  • 0142-5242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2494
OpenAlex
W2792031610
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Grass and Forage Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (11/1/13)
  • Agrisearch Northern Ireland (D-47-09)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Keywords
grazing intensity, dairy cattle, high-producing dairy cows, rotational grazing, milk yield, milk fat and protein content, concentrate supplementation, Holstein cows, sward height, milk fatty acids, blood metabolites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review