CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 221Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingBone health and osteoporosis research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual‐energy X ‐ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body composition in a community‐dwelling older population

Kim, Miji, Shinkai, Shoji, Murayama, Hiroshi, Mori, Seijiro·2015·Geriatrics & Gerontology International
DOI 10.1111/ggi.12384
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the present study was to examine the agreement of segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis ( SMF‐BIA ) for the assessment of whole‐body and appendicular fat mass ( FM ) and lean soft tissue mass ( LSTM ) compared with dual‐energy X ‐ray absorptiometry ( DXA ) in a community‐dwelling J apanese older population. Methods: The study population included 551 community‐dwelling J apanese older adults (241 men and 310 women) aged between 65 and 87 years. Agreement between SMF‐BIA and DXA for whole‐body and appendicular body composition was assessed using simple linear regression and B land– A ltman analysis. Results: High coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) were observed for whole‐body FM ( R 2 = 0.91, standard error of estimate [ SEE ] = 1.4 kg in men and R 2 = 0.94, SEE = 1.2 kg in women) between SMF‐BIA and DXA . The R 2 coefficient for whole‐body LSTM was higher in men ( R 2 = 0.88, SEE = 1.9 kg) than in women ( R 2 = 0.83, SEE = 1.5 kg). There was systematic bias with overestimation of whole‐body FM and underestimation of whole‐body LSTM by SMF‐BIA . Proportional bias was noted for measurement of whole‐body FM and LSTM in both men and women, but there was no proportional bias between the two methods for measurement of appendicular LSTM ( r = 0.05, P = 0.428 and r = −0.10, P = 0.070 for men and women, respectively). Conclusion: SMF‐BIA is a good alternative for estimating the whole‐body and appendicular FM and LSTM in a community‐dwelling J apanese older population, although it overestimated FM and underestimated LSTM when validated against DXA . Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; 15: 1013–1022.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ggi.12384

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 221

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kim, M., Shinkai, S., Murayama, H., & Mori, S.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Kim, Miji
ORCID
Venue
Geriatrics & Gerontology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-27
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1013-1022
ISSN
  • 1444-1586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0594
DOI
10.1111/ggi.12384
OpenAlex
W1579246632
Cited by
221
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24792611)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, body composition, fat mass, lean soft tissue mass, appendicular lean mass, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, measurement agreement, validation
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Residence Characteristics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Geriatric Assessment, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Electric Impedance, Risk Assessment, Sarcopenia, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review