Cited by 8Medication Adherence and CompliancePharmacy and Medical PracticesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The role of training and medication reminder wristwatch in adherence to treatment in geriatric patients diagnosed with hypertension: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Solmaz, Tuğba, Altay, Birsen·2024·Geriatrics & Gerontology International

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the training and medication reminder wristwatch on treatment adherence in geriatric patients diagnosed with hypertension. Methods: In this study, which was conducted as a randomized clinical trial with a pretest‐posttest design, 90 patients were randomly divided into the training and medication reminder wristwatch (W) group ( n = 30) group, the training (T) group ( n = 30), and the control (C) group ( n = 30). All patients answered the data collection forms before and after the interventions. Results: By the end of the 12th week, the mean knowledge scores of the groups significantly differed from each other ( t = −13.207, P < 0.001). The mean Hypertension Compliance Assessment Scale score of the W group was found to be significantly lower ( t = 22.732, P < 0.001). The highest mean Medication Adherence Self‐Efficacy Scale–Short Form score was found in the W group ( t = −13.560, P < 0.001). In the posttest, the mean systolic blood pressure values of the patients were 142.7 ± 11.1 in the C group, 126.0 ± 13.0 mm Hg in the T group, and 120.0 ± 9.5 mm Hg in the W group (Kruskal–Wallis test = 38.065, P < 0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that 12 weeks of a training program and the use of medication reminder wristwatches were effective in adherence to treatment. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1189–1195 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ggi.14999

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 CONSORT flow diagram of study. ATTP, Adaptation to Treatment Training Program; C, control; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; MRWA, Medication Reminder Wristwatch Application; T, training; W, medication reminder wristwatch.
Figure 1 CONSORT flow diagram of study. ATTP, Adaptation to Treatment Training Program; C, control; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; MRWA, Medication Reminder Wristwatch Application; T, training; W, medication reminder wristwatch.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Dinnocenzio C, 2020, Improving hypertension self‐management in older adults, Am J Nurs, 15, 15
  2. Thuy LT, 2020, Factors explaining medication adherence of older adults with hypertension: a cross‐sectional study, Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res, 24, 306
  3. Hacıhasanoglu R, 2009, Treatment adherence affecting factors in hypertension, TAF Prev Med Bull, 8, 167
  4. 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00049 · DOI
  5. Canan Demirbag B, 2012, The knowledge, attitude and behavior related to using drugs reflected by the group of elderly, Ank Med J, 11, 1
  6. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003659 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.010 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s13670-019-0270-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1186/s40885-020-00158-8 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/jch.13098 · DOI
  11. Aydan S, 2016, Quantified self and wearable technology in healthcare: possible benefits, current situation and suggestions, Hacettepe J Health Administration, 19, 325
  12. 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.001 · DOI
  13. 10.15420/ecr.2019.02 · DOI
  14. 10.26650/FNJN427146 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/03007995.2018.1549026 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0255 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kankaya H, 2017, The medication adherence self‐efficacy in elderly hypertensive patients, J Ege University Nurs Fac, 33, 1
  18. Kling JM, 2021, Relevance of sex differences in adherence to cardiovascular medications, Mayo Clin Proc, 96, 1442
  19. Burnier M, 2020, Assessing adherence to antihypertensive medications: pitfalls of measurement methods and combinational polytherapy, Curr Hypertens Rep, 22, 59
  20. Ivers NM, 2012, Impact of high quality vs. lower quality risk of bias on the estimated effects of randomized controlled trials of quality improvement interventions: meta‐epidemiological study, BMJ, 344
  21. 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.03.001 · DOI
  22. Bangurah SS, 2017, Hypertension in the faith community a four‐week, nurse led, diet/exercise intervertion, J Clin Nurs, 34, 225
  23. 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. Demirezen E, 2006, Antihypertensive Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Turkish Patients Living in Turkey and Germany
  25. 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00053-2 · DOI
  26. Hacıhasanoğlu R, 2012, Validity of the turkish version of the medication adherence self‐efficacy scale‐short form in hypertensive patients, Anatol J Cardiol, 12, 241
  27. 10.2147/PPA.S195446 · DOI
  28. 10.1186/s13690-019-0349-x · DOI
  29. Fava SMCL, 2015, The influence of selfmeasured pressure on the adhrence to systemıc blood hypertensıon treatment, J Nurs UFPE, 9, 1230
  30. Farahmand F, 2019, Effectiveness of a self‐care education program on hypertension management in older adults discharged from cardiac‐internal wards, ARYA Atheroscler, 15, 44
  31. Sutipan P, 2018, Effects of self‐management program on healthy lifestyle behaviors among older adults with hypertension, TJBS, 13, 38
  32. 10.1186/s13063-017-2063-8 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Solmaz, T., & Altay, B.
Affiliations
  • Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR)
Corresponding author
Solmaz, Tuğba
Venue
Geriatrics & Gerontology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-10-15
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1189-1195
ISSN
  • 1444-1586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0594
OpenAlex
W4403406348
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi (PYO.SBF.1904.20.001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
hypertension, medication adherence, elderly patients, patient education, medication self-efficacy, blood pressure control, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Reminder Systems, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review