The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration
Abstract
We argue that social media are not only new communication channels in migration networks, but also that they actively transform the nature of these networks and thereby facilitate migration. Despite some limitations, which stem from the ‘digital divide’ and the lower trustworthiness of virtual ties, qualitative data reveal four relevant ways in which social media facilitate international migration. First, they enhance the possibilities of maintaining strong ties with family and friends. Second, they address weak ties that are relevant to organizing the process of migration and integration. Third, they establish a new infrastructure consisting of latent ties. Fourth, they offer a rich source of insider knowledge on migration that is discrete and unofficial. This makes potential migrants ‘streetwise’ when undertaking migration. Based on these empirical findings we conclude that social media are transforming migration networks and thereby lowering the threshold for migration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 25,991
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
Goffman, E. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-59 · Cited by 17,562
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education.
O'Shea, D. W., & Richardson, J. G. (1987) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069964 · Cited by 15,142
Bourdieu, P. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch15 · Cited by 13,906
Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology
Portes, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1 · Cited by 12,037 · cited 4×
“The migrant networks accessed via social media do not necessarily represent social capital: what matters is the individual’s ability to utilize the resources they offer (Portes 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialSymbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method.
Kanter, R. M., & Blumer, H. (1971) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094060 · Cited by 9,967
Cited by
The Internetization of International Migration
Pesando, L. M., Rotondi, V., Stranges, M., Kashyap, R., & Billari, F. C. (2021) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12371 · Cited by 35
Emerging Technologies and Family Communication: The Case of International Students
Bacigalupe, G., & Bräuninger, I. (2017) · Contemporary Family Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10591-017-9437-7 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- DEKKER, R., & ENGBERSEN, G.
- Venue
- Global Networks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401-418
- ISSN
- 1470-2266 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0374
- OpenAlex
- W2021625132
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 48.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/glob.12040
- The paper
- DEKKER, R., & ENGBERSEN, G. (2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.