Structures of D 14 and D 14 L in the strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways
Abstract
Strigolactones (SL s) are plant hormones that inhibit shoot branching. DWARF 14 (D 14) inhibits rice tillering and is an SL receptor candidate in the branching inhibition pathway, whereas the close homologue DWARF 14‐LIKE (D 14 L) participates in the signaling pathway of karrikins (KAR s), which are derived from burnt vegetation as smoke stimulants of seed germination. We provide the first evidence for direct binding of the bioactive SL analogue GR 24 to D 14. Isothermal titration calorimetry measurements show a D 14–GR 24 binding affinity in the sub‐micromolar range. Similarly, bioactive KAR 1 directly binds D 14 L in the micromolar range. The crystal structure of rice D 14 shows a compact α‐/β‐fold hydrolase domain forming a deep ligand‐binding pocket capable of accommodating GR 24. Insertion of four α‐helices between β6 strand and α D helix forms the helical cap of the pocket, although the pocket is open to the solvent. The pocket contains the conserved catalytic triad S er‐H is‐A sp aligned with the oxyanion hole, suggesting hydrolase activity. Although these structural characteristics are conserved in D 14 L, the D 14 L pocket is smaller than that of D 14. The KAR‐insensitive mutation kai2‐1 is located at the prominent long β6‐α D 1 loop, which is characteristic in D 14 and D 14 L, but not in related α‐/β‐fold hydrolases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
D14 is most likely a receptor for SL.
“The α/β hydrolase D14 is most likely a receptor for SL.”
From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Kagiyama et al., 2013
D14 exhibits high and specific affinity to GR24.
“Also, D14 exhibits high and specific affinity to GR24 (Kagiyama et al., 2013).”
From Shaping plant architecture (2015) · cites this paper as Kagiyama et al., 2013
Cites
<i>MAX1</i> and <i>MAX2</i> control shoot lateral branching in <i>Arabidopsis</i>
Stirnberg, P., van de Sande, K., & Leyser, H. M. O. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.5.1131 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Sorefan, K., Booker, J., Haurogné, K., Goussot, M., Bainbridge, K., Foo, E., Chatfield, S., Ward, S., Beveridge, C., Rameau, C., et al. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.256603 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular mechanism of strigolactone perception by DWARF14
Nakamura, H., Xue, Y.-L., Miyakawa, T., Hou, F., Qin, H.-M., Fukui, K., Shi, X., Ito, E., Ito, S., Park, S.-H., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3613 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Multiple pathways regulate shoot branching
Rameau, C., Bertheloot, J., Leduc, N., Andrieu, B., Foucher, F., & Sakr, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00741 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Sun, S., Zhu, W., Jia, K., Yang, H., & Wang, X. (2013) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.11.010 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Strigolactones and the control of plant development: lessons from shoot branching
Waldie, T., McCulloch, H., & Leyser, O. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12488 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Teichmann, T., & Muhr, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00233 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“In turn, rice fc1 knockout mutants did not respond to SL (Minakuchi et al., 2010) and also in Arabidopsis, GR24 treatment did not repress the increased branching phenotype of the Atbrc1 mutant (Brewer et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Kagiyama, M., Hirano, Y., Mori, T., Kim, S., Kyozuka, J., Seto, Y., Yamaguchi, S., & Hakoshima, T.
- Affiliations
- Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Hakoshima, Toshio
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genes to Cells
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-160
- ISSN
- 1356-9597 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2443
- OpenAlex
- W2033098267
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Genes to Cells (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24780117)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
- Keywords
- strigolactone signaling, karrikin signaling, DWARF14, GR24, rice, protein-ligand binding, crystal structure, binding pocket, catalytic triad, seed germination
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Furans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Plant Growth Regulators, Plant Proteins, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Pyrans, Oryza, Signal Transduction, Sequence Alignment, Catalytic Domain, Protein Stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review