The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Rehabilitation environments: Service users’ perspective
Open accessAbstract
Background: Design of rehabilitation environments is usually “expert” driven with little consideration given to the perceptions of service users, especially patients and informal carers. There is a need to engage with consumers of services to gain their insights into what design aspects are required to facilitate optimum physical activity, social interaction and psychological responses when they are attempting to overcome their limitations and regain function. Research design: Qualitative exploratory study. Method: Interviews were conducted with patients (n = 54) and informal carers (n = 23), and focus groups with rehabilitation staff (n = 90), from the three metropolitan South Australia rehabilitation health services, comprising different building and environmental configurations. Thematic analysis was assisted by the use of NV ivo 11 qualitative software, with pooled data from all interviews and focus groups undergoing open, axial and finally selective coding. Results: Four major themes were identified as follows: (a) choice can be an Illusion in a rehabilitation ward; (b) access to outside areas is a priority and affects well‐being; (c) socialization can be facilitated by the environment; and (d) ward configuration should align with the model of care. Discussion and Conclusion: Participants who encountered the most restrictive environments accepted their situation until probed to consider alternatives; those who enjoyed the most choice and access to facilities showed the greatest enthusiasm for these affordances. Future architectural designers should therefore consider the perceptions of a wide range of consumers with varying experiences to ensure they understand the complex requirements of patients and that the ward design facilitates the optimum rehabilitation model of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 23
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2000.tb01889.x · DOI
- 10.1108/02632771311324945 · DOI
- Milne P, 2007, Rehabilitation Services in Tasmania: Current Situation and Future Plans
- Bargh JA, 2001, The perception‐behavior expressway: automatic effects of social perception on social behavior, Adv Exp Soc Psychol, 33, 1, 10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80003-4 · DOI · Paper page
- GolembiewskiJ.We are our architecture. Science and Non‐duality Conference.San Rafael CA:Centre for Consciousness Studies University of Arizona;2009.
- 10.1108/02632771311324981 · DOI
- South Australia Department of Health, 2015, Delivering Transforming Health‐Summary
- 10.3109/09638288.2014.1001525 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00842.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00451.x · DOI
- 10.1211/ijpp.16.4.0005 · DOI
- Institute of Medicine, 2001, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03990.x · DOI
- Ulrich RS.Effects of healthcare environmental design on medical outcomes. Paper presented at: Design and Health: Second International Conference on Health and Design. Stockholm Sweden;2001.
- 10.1093/geront/40.5.549 · DOI
- Gesler W, 2017, Commentary on the origins and early development of the therapeutic landscapes concept, Med Anthropol Theory, 4, 1, 10.17157/mat.4.1.358 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/18.2.133 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/23.4.349 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013916585174005 · DOI
- DePoy E, 1998, Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies
- 10.5014/ajot.45.3.214 · DOI · Paper page
- Isaacson W, 2011, Steve Jobs: The Exclusive Biography
- VlaskovitsP.Henry Ford Innovation and That “Faster Horse Quote”.Harvard Business Review;2011.
- Lawrence RJ, 2002, Hand Book of Environmental Psychology
- Suresh M, 2006, Person environment relationships to health and wellbeing: an integrated approach, Interior Design/Interior Architecture Educators Association Journal, 2006, 87
- Rapoport A, 1990, The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach
- 10.3109/11038128.2010.509887 · DOI
- 10.3928/0098-9134-20040201-08 · DOI
- Galea S, 2006, Environmental Health: From Global to Local
- 10.3846/20297955.2016.1165385 · DOI
- Ulrich RS, 1983, Human Behavior and Environment, 85
- 10.3846/20297955.2016.1150220 · DOI
- Lazurus R, 1966, Psychological Stress and the Coping Process
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-4425-5_3 · DOI
- Mazumdar S, 2000, People and the Built Environment, 157
- 10.1177/0269215508091872 · DOI
- 10.3109/09638289509166621 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02259.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.024 · DOI
- Kaplan R, 1989, The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective
- 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/intqhc/mzl073 · DOI
- 10.1006/jevp.1998.0089 · DOI · Paper page
- Palacio J, 2012, Stitchtures: Interactive Art Installations for Social Interventions in Retirement Communities
- 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00255.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Killington, M., Fyfe, D., Patching, A., Habib, P., McNamara, A., Kay, R., Kochiyil, V., & Crotty, M.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Central Adelaide Local Health Network (AU)
- Northern Adelaide Local Health Network Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Bedford Park South Australia Australia
- Corresponding author
- Killington, Maggie
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 396-404
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC6543154
- OpenAlex
- W2910398772
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
- Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (SAC HREC ECOO188)
- Southern Local Health Network of South Australia (425.16-HREC/16/SAC/431)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Facilities and Workplace Management
- Keywords
- hospital ward design, service user perspectives, informal caregivers, patient experience, physical activity, social interaction, psychological well-being, socialization, models of care, architectural design
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Facility Design and Construction, Female, Humans, Male, Patients, Rehabilitation Centers, Software, South Australia, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review