Gnathic giant‐cell‐rich conventional osteosarcoma with MDM2 and CDK4 gene amplification
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 has been reported in several types of cancers including sarcoma, glioblastoma, bladder cancer and gastric cancer.
“Moreover, the co-amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 has been reported in several type of cancers including sarcoma, glioblastoma, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, etc.40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50”
Cites
Yoshida, A., Ushiku, T., Motoi, T., Shibata, T., Beppu, Y., Fukayama, M., & Tsuda, H. (2010) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.124 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Yoshida, A., Ushiku, T., Motoi, T., Beppu, Y., Fukayama, M., Tsuda, H., & Shibata, T. (2012) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e31824230d0 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Chow, L. T. C. (2016) · Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin · doi:10.1007/s00428-016-1926-9 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Primary Giant Cell Rich Osteosarcoma of Maxilla: An Unusual Case Report
Verma, R. K., Gupta, G., Bal, A., et al. (2011) · Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery · doi:10.1007/s12663-010-0066-z · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Giant Cell-Rich Osteosarcoma or Giant Cell Reparative Granuloma of the Mandible?
Fu, H. H., Zhuang, Q. W., He, J., et al. (2011) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0b013e3182108fbf · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, B., Peng, F., Huang, W., Zhou, J., Zhang, N., Sheng, J., Haruehanroengra, P., He, G., & Han, B. (2020) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2019.12.013 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hirose, K., Okura, M., Sato, S., Murakami, S., Ikeda, J., Noda, Y., Fukuda, Y., Morii, E., & Toyosawa, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- The University of Osaka Dental Hospital (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Histopathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-22
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1171-1173
- ISSN
- 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2559
- OpenAlex
- W2560334279
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Histopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K11667, 16K08649)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Keywords
- osteosarcoma, giant cell-rich osteosarcoma, MDM2 amplification, conventional osteosarcoma, gene amplification, tumor suppressor
- MeSH terms
- Gene Amplification, Humans, Male, Maxillary Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Osteosarcoma, Giant Cell Tumor of Bone, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review