CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 227Resilience and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and careHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Resilience of patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review

Open access
Kim, Geun Myun, Lim, Ji Young, Kim, Eun Joo, Park, Seung‐Min·2019·Health & Social Care in the Community
DOI 10.1111/hsc.12620
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to contribute to the development of a resilience-promoting programme for patients with chronic diseases. A systematic review of literature concerning resilience interventions for patients with chronic diseases was conducted by searching PubMed (including Medline), Science Direct, Web of Science, PsycARTICLES, CINAHL Plus, Embase, and the Cochrane Database for articles featuring the terms "resilience," "resiliency," "resilient," "cancer," "stroke," "heart disease," "diabetes" and "COPD" and published between 8 January 2017 and 15 January 2017. We included all English studies relevant to the topic; however, we excluded: (1) nonrandomised controlled trials and (2) those that mentioned the term "resilience" but did not apply it in their analysis. Seventeen studies-10 on cancer, four on cardiovascular diseases and three on diabetes-were deemed suitable for analysis. We found that, in these studies, (1) diverse definitions of resilience were applied, (2) various intervention durations were used and (3) complex programmes were applied within the resilience-improving programmes. Our research encourages efforts to operationalise the construct of resilience, so it can be applied in clinical settings, and for the development of more systematic intervention programmes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.12620

Cites

38 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Gong M. S., 2009, Hope and resilience of patients on dialysis
  3. Irwin N. S., 2008, Resilience rather recovery: A contextual framework on adaptation following bereavement
  4. Kim S., 2015, The effect of a group coaching program on resilience, self‐esteem in breast cancer patients: Pilot study, Supportive Care in Cancer, 23, s71
  5. Klatt M., 2016, An intervention with caregivers and survivors together encouraging resilient cancer survivorship: A feasibility study, Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 22, A79
  6. Pennisi J., 2013, Improving adherence through enhancing resilience: Protocol of the resourceful adolescent program, Pediatric Diabetes, 14, 106
  7. Sansom‐Daly U. M., 2014, Adapting evidence‐based psychological therapy to the computer screen for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: Preliminary results from the ‘recapture life’ randomized controlled trial, Asia‐Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10, 36
  8. Seok H. K.(2015).Development of a family resilience‐strengthening program for families of older adults with dementia. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dankook University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–227 of 227

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kim, G. M., Lim, J. Y., Kim, E. J., & Park, S.
Affiliations
  • Gangneung–Wonju National University (KR)
  • Inha University (KR)
  • Sangji University (KR)
  • CHA University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Eun Joo
ORCID
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-20
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
797-807
ISSN
  • 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2524
DOI
10.1111/hsc.12620
OpenAlex
W2884350884
Cited by
219
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gangneung-Wonju National University (2016100260)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
resilience, chronic disease, resilience interventions, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, patient resilience, intervention development, construct operationalization
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review