Cited by 41Workplace Violence and BullyingPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePatient Safety and Medication Errors

A communication skills intervention to minimise patient perpetrated aggression for healthcare support workers in New Zealand: A cluster randomised controlled trial

Baby, Maria, Gale, Christopher, Swain, Nicola·2019·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

Healthcare support workers face challenging situations in their day-to-day work but may have minimal training on how to deal with such incidents. Although staff training is often recommended as an essential part of any comprehensive approach for preventing and managing workplace violence, there is paucity of evidence on the content and effectiveness of such training. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an intervention (communication skills training) to reduce the experience of aggression for healthcare support workers. A two arm, cluster randomised, single-blinded, controlled trial among healthcare support workers in nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) and District Health Boards (DHBs) in New Zealand was conducted. The trial was conducted across 14 NGOs and DHB in Otago, Southland, and Auckland regions of New Zealand. One hundred and twenty-seven participants were randomised to one of two groups. Both the intervention (communication skills) and control condition (mindfulness) were group-based, fully scripted, and structured training interventions that consisted of four once weekly workshops that were facilitated by one of two nonclinical facilitators. Measurements of perceived aggression, psychological well-being, and distress and communication competence were taken pre-, post-, 3 months' post-, and 6 months' postintervention. There was a significant drop in the rate of aggression over time with a mean score and standard deviation of 10.37 (9.169) at baseline dropping…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hsc.12636

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baby, M., Gale, C., & Swain, N.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Baby, Maria
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-02
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
170-181
ISSN
  • 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2524
OpenAlex
W2890819453
Cited by
41
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
James Hume Bequest Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
patient aggression, healthcare assistants, communication skills training, workplace violence, mindfulness training, psychological well-being, distress, communication competence, employee training, non-governmental organizations, District Health Boards
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Allied Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, New Zealand, Patients, Professional-Patient Relations, Single-Blind Method, Workplace Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review