Cited by 27Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsClimate Change Communication and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Climate Change Science and Responsible Trust: A Situated Approach

Grasswick, Heidi·2014·Hypatia

Abstract

I adopt a situated approach to the question of what would constitute responsible trust and/or distrust in climate change science, and I identify some of the major challenges for laypersons in their attempts to know well by placing their trust in climate change experts. I examine evidence that white males, as a group of relative privilege, are more likely to distrust the institutions of climate change science than are other demographic groups, and use this example to consider specific challenges facing those who occupy positions of privilege and who seek to place their epistemic trust wisely. I argue that the insights of feminist standpoint theory and epistemologies of ignorance concerning the role of positionality in knowledge production and the need for critical reflexivity can be applied to cases of epistemic trust as well; in some contexts, such as climate change science, considerations of how those differently situated from oneself place their trust will be valuable contributions to responsible assignments of trust.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/hypa.12090

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1073/pnas.1003187107 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/02691728.2011.652213 · DOI
  3. Daukas, 2011, Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge
  4. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1023/A:1010636822581 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511841200 · DOI
  7. Jasanoff, 2011, The Oxford handbook of climate change and society
  8. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01110.x · DOI
  9. Kalof, 2002, Race, gender and environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men, Race, Gender and Class, 9
  10. Harding, 1991, Whose science? Whose knowledge?
  11. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dunlap, 2011, The Oxford handbook of climate change and society
  13. 10.1038/468345a · DOI
  14. Pachauri, 2007, Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  15. 10.1093/0195159438.001.0001 · DOI
  16. Dunlap, 2008, A widening gap: Republican and democratic views on climate change, Environment, 50, 26, 10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Scheman, 2001, Engendering rationalities
  18. 10.2307/2027007 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.3366/epi.2011.0013 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1007/s11229-010-9789-0 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x · DOI
  23. Borick, 2012, Fall 2011 national survey of American public opinion on climate change, Issues in Governance Studies, 44, 1
  24. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x · DOI
  25. Wylie, 2003, Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophies of science and technology
  26. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x · DOI
  29. 2008, A deeper partisan divide over global warming
  30. 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01267.x · DOI
  31. 10.7312/mann15254 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/13552070802696839 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L · DOI
  34. Oreskes, 2010, Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Grasswick, H.
Corresponding author
Grasswick, Heidi
Venue
Hypatia
Published
2014
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
541-557
ISSN
  • 0887-5367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-2001
OpenAlex
W2128629473
Cited by
27
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hypatia (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1230600)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords
epistemic trust, climate science, situated knowledge, feminist standpoint theory, epistemology of ignorance, positionality, privilege, critical reflexivity, laypeople, research institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate Change Science and Responsible Trust: A Situated Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/hypa.12090
The paper
Grasswick, H. (2014). Climate Change Science and Responsible Trust: A Situated Approach. Hypatia. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12090