The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated auditory detection of a rare, secretive marsh bird with infrequent and acoustically indistinct vocalizations
Abstract
Autonomous recording units (ARUs) provide a non‐invasive and efficient method for acoustic detection of elusive species across large temporal and spatial scales. However, species with indistinct vocalization structures can be a considerable challenge for automated signal recognizers. We investigated the performance of ARUs and signal recognizers in identifying the broadband, short‐syllable, pulsed calls of a secretive, threatened marsh bird, the King Rail Rallus elegans. Other sympatric species in the same habitat also have repetitive calls within the same frequency range that can be difficult to distinguish. Following serial ARU deployments at specified sites in known breeding habitat, we conducted standardized callback surveys and nest searches to provide an independent measure of breeder density. To analyse recordings, we developed a signal recognizer based on user‐input training files to detect two common call types, kek and grunt. Detections that remained following manual review of recognizer output revealed a previously undescribed seasonal decline and crepuscular diel pattern in calling rate. The rate of the grunt call also predicted density. These patterns emerged despite the recognizer's low precision and high false‐positive rate, which were largely due to misclassification of other species' calls, although ambient noise and effective detection radius also limited the detectability of King Rail calls. We demonstrate that with informed ARU scheduling, improved ability to manipulate user‐specified parameters within signal detection software, and attention to quality control, even the simplest call structures can be located consistently in a diverse acoustic landscape. Our behavioural findings will inform improvements to auditory surveys and to management of King Rails across their range.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“machine-learning pipelines can now chew through thousands of hours of recordings, extracting species detections, call counts, and even behavioral cues with little human intervention”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Schroeder and McRae 2020
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6872 · Cited by 12,826
unmarked : An R Package for Fitting Hierarchical Models of Wildlife Occurrence and Abundance
Fiske, I., & Chandler, R. B. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v043.i10 · Cited by 2,448
Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds
Morton, E. S. (1975) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282971 · Cited by 1,665
Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications
Shonfield, J., & Bayne, E. M. (2017) · Avian Conservation and Ecology · doi:10.5751/ace-00974-120114 · Cited by 399
Detecting bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic monitoring
Bardeli, R., Wolff, D., Kurth, F., Koch, M., Tauchert, K.-H., & Frommolt, K. (2009) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.014 · Cited by 342
Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol
Conway, C. J. (2011) · Waterbirds · doi:10.1675/063.034.0307 · Cited by 284
A practical comparison of manual and autonomous methods for acoustic monitoring
Digby, A., Towsey, M., Bell, B. D., & Teal, P. D. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12060 · Cited by 278
Knight, E. C., Hannah, K. C., Foley, G. J., Scott, C. D., Brigham, R. M., & Bayne, E. M. (2017) · Avian Conservation and Ecology · doi:10.5751/ace-01114-120214 · Cited by 230
Do you hear what I hear? Implications of detector selection for acoustic monitoring of bats
Adams, A. M., Jantzen, M. K., Hamilton, R., & Fenton, M. B. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00244.x · Cited by 198
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Butler C.J., 2015, Assessing black rail occupancy and vocalisations along the Texas Gulf Coast
- Charif R.A., 2010, Raven Pro 1.4 User’s Manual
- Cooper T.R., 2008, King Rail Conservation Plan, Version 1, 121
- Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2011, Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software
- Duke E.C., 2013, Testing the efficacy of autonomous recording units for monitoring secretive marsh birds
- Skaug H., 2016, Generalized Linear Mixed Models using ‘AD Model Building’. R package version 0.8.5
Cited by
Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Zsebők, S. (2026) · Biologia Futura · doi:10.1007/s42977-026-00322-5
“This flood of audio data has been matched by dramatic gains in analysis: machine-learning pipelines can now chew through thousands of hours of recordings, extracting species detections, call counts, and even behavioral cues with little human intervention (Schroeder and McRae 2020).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroeder, K. M., & McRae, S. B.
- Affiliations
- East Carolina University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schroeder, Katie M.
- Venue
- Ibis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-10
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1033-1046
- ISSN
- 0019-1019 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-919X
- OpenAlex
- W2993137105
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ibis (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- East Carolina University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- King Rail, Rallus elegans, autonomous recording units, call recognition, pulsed calls, breeding density, false positive detection, marsh birds, threatened species management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated auditory detection of a rare, secretive marsh bird with infrequent and acoustically indistinct vocalizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ibi.12805
- The paper
- Schroeder, K. M., & McRae, S. B. (2020). Automated auditory detection of a rare, secretive marsh bird with infrequent and acoustically indistinct vocalizations. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.