The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Literature Review on Recent Lean Research: State‐of‐the‐art and Future Directions
Abstract
Lean management (LM) has attracted the interest of scientists and practitioners since 1990, when Womack et al. (Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. New York, NY: Rawson Associates) popularized the Japanese manufacturing approach aimed at eliminating waste to improve operational performance and customer satisfaction. Over the years, the lean concept has evolved becoming a managerial paradigm applicable to different sectors and processes with impressive results. This heterogeneity of implementations and settings makes the recent LM literature diverse and fragmented, and an extensive analysis of the latest contributions on this field is lacking. To address this gap, the authors propose a systematic literature review (SLR) of 240 articles published in 25 peer‐reviewed academic journals from January 2003 to December 2015. The purpose is to analyse the recent trends in this area and to provide a framework that organizes lean researched issues into mature, intermediate and nascent, based on their position in the research life cycle. Starting from the gaps that the SLR highlights, the authors suggest conducting lean research in the following directions: (a) grounding lean studies on existing managerial theories; (b) addressing service settings such as banking/finance, public sector and education; (c) exploring the role of national culture through cross‐country comparisons; (d) defining and conceptualizing ‘lean‐x’ processes; (e) understanding the relationships between lean and safety/environmental issues, and (f) unveiling the effects on social outcomes. Finally, the proposed framework helps scholars find issues not sufficiently explored that require theory‐building research (to move from nascent to intermediate) or theory‐testing research (to move from intermediate to mature).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations.
Krippendorff, K. (2004) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/30.3.411 · Cited by 1,027
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Lean, leaner, too lean? The inventory–performance link revisited
Eroglu, C., & Hofer, C. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.05.002 · Cited by 440
Parker, S. K. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.620 · Cited by 438
The effects of Lean production on worker job stress
Conti, R., Angelis, J., Cooper, C., Faragher, B., & Gill, C. (2006) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570610682616 · Cited by 336
Internal lean practices and performance: The role of technological turbulence
Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Fynes, B., Wiengarten, F., & Lecuna, A. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.005 · Cited by 200
A literature review of empirical research methodology in lean manufacturing
Vamsi Krishna Jasti, N., & Kodali, R. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2012-0169 · Cited by 178
Call centers as Lean service environments: job-related strain and the mediating role of work design
Sprigg, C. A., & Jackson, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.197 · Cited by 151
Cited by
Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research
Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00718-x · Cited by 944
Consumer behavior in sustainable fashion: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
Busalim, A., Fox, G., & Lynn, T. (2022) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12794 · Cited by 197
The role of HRM in developing sustainable organizations: Contemporary challenges and contradictions
Podgorodnichenko, N., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.001 · Cited by 160
Is lean a theory? Viewpoints and outlook
Åhlström, P., Danese, P., Hines, P., Netland, T. H., Powell, D., Shah, R., Thürer, M., & van Dun, D. H. (2021) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2021-0408 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Danese, P., Manfè, V., & Romano, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-16
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 579-605
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W2770256834
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Literature Review on Recent Lean Research: State‐of‐the‐art and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ijmr.12156
- The paper
- Danese, P., Manfè, V., & Romano, P. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review on Recent Lean Research: State‐of‐the‐art and Future Directions. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.