Cited by 12Personality Traits and PsychologyPharmacy and Medical PracticesHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Using the big five inventory to evaluate the personality traits of Australian pharmacists

Waddell, Jason J, Nissen, Lisa M, Hale, Andrew R, Kyle, Gregory·2020·International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Abstract

Objectives: Pharmacist personality traits may explain the incomplete uptake of extended scope pharmacy practice roles. The objective of this study was to explore the personality traits of Australian pharmacists using the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Australian pharmacists was undertaken. Pharmacists were asked to complete a short demographic survey and the BFI, a 44-item survey that measures the Big Five personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness. Each trait can be scored out of a maximum of 5. The BFI and multivariate linear regression were used to assess associations between personality traits and demographic variables. Key findings: A total of 122 responses were available for analysis. The majority of study participants were female (79.5%), were aged between 30 and 39 years (32.0%) and worked in hospital pharmacy (46.7%). Pharmacists scored (mean (standard deviation)) 3.4 (0.7) for extraversion, 3.9 (0.5) for agreeableness, 4.2 (0.5) for conscientiousness, 2.5 (0.8) for neuroticism and 3.5 (0.6) for openness. Associations were found between agreeableness and qualifications and location of pharmacy practice, neuroticism and working in a practice location (rural versus metropolitan) and age, and openness and practice location (rural versus metropolitan) and principle role in pharmacy. Conclusions: Pharmacists displayed high scores on the traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness and scored moderately on the trait of openness. Confirmation with a larger sample size and evaluation in the context of pharmacy practice change may assist in overcoming barriers to change in the pharmacy profession.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijpp.12597

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waddell, J. J., Nissen, L. M., Hale, A. R., & Kyle, G.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Corresponding author
Waddell, Jason J
Venue
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Published
2019-12-12
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
275-281
ISSN
  • 0961-7671 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7174
OpenAlex
W2996109858
Cited by
12
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience, hospital pharmacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Pharmacists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review