Family policies, social norms and marital fertility decisions: A quasi‐experimental study
Abstract
Numerous policy recommendations for increasing fertility in societies with ultralow fertility rates have been made, yet their effectiveness has mostly remained unevaluated. Using a multifactorial vignette design that creates hypothetical policy scenarios, this paper seeks to determine the effects of family‐friendly policies and organizational norms on fertility decisions in Hong Kong. Based on a territory‐wide random sample (N = 1000), we find a discrepancy between respondents’ ideal and actual number of children. All family policy recommendations, including leave policies, childcare support, housing policies and workhour legislation, may raise fertility but leave policies work better when they include fathers’ involvement instead of just mothers. Childcare support and housing policies have a positive multiplying effect on fertility. Family‐friendly organizational norms strengthen the positive effect of workhour legislation and leave policies on fertility. The effects of policies on fertility also vary by respondents’ socioeconomic status and their perception of having children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A multifactorial vignette study in Hong Kong suggests a positive effect of childcare support and housing policy on fertility decisions and highlights the importance of broader 'family friendly organizational norms' in strengthening the effect of individual policy measures.
“Results suggest a positive effect of childcare support and housing policy but also highlight the importance of broader 'family friendly organizational norms' in strengthening the effect of individual policy measures.”
From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Lui and Cheung 2021
Cites
Does family policy affect fertility?: Lessons from Sweden
Björklund, A. (2006) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-005-0024-0 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Babies, Work, or Both? Highly Educated Women’s Employment and Fertility in East Asia
Brinton, M. C., & Oh, E. (2019) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/704369 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
The gender division of labor and second births: Labor market institutions and fertility in Japan
Nagase, N., & Brinton, M. C. (2017) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2017.36.11 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections
Gauthier, A. H., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2025) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12691 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lui, L., & Cheung, A. K.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Lui, Lake
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Welfare
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-24
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 396-409
- ISSN
- 0907-2055 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-6866
- 1468-2397
- OpenAlex
- W3172584053
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Social Welfare (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Keywords
- family policy, reproductive decision-making, social norms, leave policy, childcare support, housing policy, Hong Kong, socioeconomic status
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review