Cited by 91Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsWork-Family Balance Challenges

The gender division of labor and second births: Labor market institutions and fertility in Japan

Open access
Nagase, Nobuko, Brinton, Mary C.·2017·Demographic Research

Abstract

Research has examined how the gendered household division of labor may deter the transition to second birth. However, little research has investigated how workplace norms influence men’s household work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4054/demres.2017.36.11

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal analyses using panel data from Germany, Italy, and Japan show that the likelihood of couples' having a second child is higher if husbands spend more time on childcare and household chores.

    “In particular, longitudinal analyses using panel data from Germany (Cooke 2004), Italy (Cooke 2009), and Japan (Nagase and Brinton 2017) show that the likelihood of couples' having a second child is higher if husbands spend more time on childcare and household chores.”

    From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as Nagase and Brinton 2017

    For Japan, Section 7.2 reports that husbands’ household-work hours, measured as housework and childcare, have a significant positive association with second births when wives are employed. It also reports no significant effect when wives are out of the labor force. The claim omits that qualification; the Germany and Italy findings are attributed to separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

22 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Hashimoto, M. and Raisian, J. (1985). Employment tenure and earnings profiles in the US and Japan. American Economic Review 75(4): 721-735.
  2. Kamoda, T. (2015). Should we leave unlimited regular employees as they are? (in Japanese) Quarterly Labor Law 248: 41-51.
  3. Mizuochi, M. (2010). Husband's childcare time and additional births: A Comparative analysis of five developed countries. Journal of Population Studies (Jinkōgaku Kenkyū) 46:1-13 (in Japanese).
  4. Nagase, N. (2003). Standard and non-standard work arrangements, pay differences, and choice of work by Japanese mothers. In Houseman, S. and Osawa, M. (eds.). Nonstandard work in developed economies. Kalamazoo: Upjohn Institute of Employment Research: 267-305
  5. Nagase, N. (2014). The effect of the short working hours option mandate on first childbirth, birth intentions, and work continuation after childbirth: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Population Studies (Jinkōgaku Kenkyū) 50: 29-53 (in Japanese).
  6. Nagase, N. and Moriizumi, R. (2011). Work and family choices of highly-educated Japanese women: The effects of changing labor practices in Japanese firms in the 1990s and 2000s. Journal of Social Sciences and Family Studies (Seikatsu Shakai Kagaku Kenkyū) 17: 1-21 (in Japanese).
  7. Nagase, N. and Moriizumi, R. (2013). Female labor force participation following the first birth: Why a small increase despite the protective law change in Japan. Journal of Social Sciences and Family Studies (Seikatsu Shakai Kagaku Kenkyū) 20: 19-36 (in Japanese).
  8. Nagase, N. and Yamaya, M. (2011). Career prospects of female university graduates in large Japanese firms: The difficulties and possibilities of track-based hiring practices. Journal of Career Research (Kyaria Dezain Kenkyū) 7: 95-105 (in Japanese).
  9. Nakagawa, M. (2010). Wives' maternal gate-keeping and husbands' involvement in childcare and housework when children are under 12 years old. Family Sociology (Kazoku Shakaigaku Kenkyū) 22(2): 201-212 (in Japanese).
  10. Takeuchi, H. (1995). Japanese meritocracy. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press (in Japanese).
  11. Tsuya, N.O., Bumpass, L.L. and Choe, M.K. (2000). Gender, employment, and housework in Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Review of Population and Social Policy 9: 195-220.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagase, N., & Brinton, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Ochanomizu University (JP)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Demographic Research
Published
2017-01-19
Volume
36
Pages
339-370
ISSN
1435-9871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2576777255
Cited by
91
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
17.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Demographic Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Center for Global Partnership
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H02029, 25245061)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
gender division of labor, second birth, fertility, labour market institutions, workplace norms, domestic work, Japan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review