Cited by 71Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Therapeutic relationships and i nvoluntary t reatment o rders: Service users' interactions with health‐care professionals on the ward

Wyder, Marianne, Bland, Robert, Blythe, Andrew, Matarasso, Beth, Crompton, David·2015·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that an involuntary hospital admission and treatment can undermine the therapeutic relationship. While good relationships with staff are important factors influencing long‐term recovery, there is little information on how people experience their relationships with staff while under an i nvoluntary t reatment o rder (ITO). Twenty‐five involuntary inpatients were interviewed about their experiences of an ITO. The interviews were analysed by a general inductive approach. Participants described the following themes: (i) the ITO admission was a daunting and frightening experience; (ii) staff behaviours and attitudes shaped their experiences in hospital; (iii) importance of staff listening to their concerns; (iv) importance of having a space to make sense of their experiences; (v) importance of staff ability to look beyond their illness and diagnosis; and (vi) importance of staff working in partnership. These findings highlight that when using recovery principles, such as an empathic engagement with the patients' lived experience, forging partnerships with patients in treatment decision‐making to enhance agency, an involuntary treatment order does not have to limit the ability to establish positive relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12121

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyder, M., Bland, R., Blythe, A., Matarasso, B., & Crompton, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Metro South Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Wyder, Marianne
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-28
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
181-189
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2141219178
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Queensland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
involuntary admission, therapeutic relationship, service user experiences, staff-patient relationship, recovery-oriented care, patient agency, treatment decision-making, psychiatric inpatients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychiatric Nursing, Patient Satisfaction, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review