Cited by 67Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and PsychiatryNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Sensory overload: A concept analysis

Scheydt, Stefan, Müller Staub, Maria, Frauenfelder, Fritz, Nielsen, Gunnar H., Behrens, Johann, Needham, Ian·2017·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

In the context of mental disorders sensory overload is a widely described phenomenon used in conjunction with psychiatric interventions such as removal from stimuli. However, the theoretical foundation of sensory overload as addressed in the literature can be described as insufficient and fragmentary. To date, the concept of sensory overload has not yet been sufficiently specified or analyzed. The aim of the study was to analyze the concept of sensory overload in mental health care. A literature search was undertaken using specific electronic databases, specific journals and websites, hand searches, specific library catalogues, and electronic publishing databases. Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis was used to analyze the sources included in the analysis. All aspects of the method of Walker and Avant were covered in this concept analysis. The conceptual understanding has become more focused, the defining attributes, influencing factors and consequences are described and empirical referents identified. The concept analysis is a first step in the development of a middle-range descriptive theory of sensory overload based on social scientific and stress-theoretical approaches. This specification may serve as a fundament for further research, for the development of a nursing diagnosis or for guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12303

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheydt, S., Müller Staub, M., Frauenfelder, F., Nielsen, G. H., Behrens, J., & Needham, I.
Affiliations
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
  • Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen The Netherlands
  • Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich (CH)
  • Evangelische Hochschule Hessen (DE)
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • Center of Education & Research (COEUR) Cantonal Psychiatric Services ‐ Sector North Wil Switzerland
Corresponding author
  • Scheydt, Stefan
  • Frauenfelder, Fritz
  • Nielsen, Gunnar H.
  • Behrens, Johann
  • Needham, Ian
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-09
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
110-120
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2586935137
Cited by
67
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
sensory overload, conceptual analysis, mental illness, mental health services, sensory deprivation, stress theory, middle-range theory, nursing diagnosis, defining attributes, influencing factors, consequences
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Perception, Physical Stimulation, Psychological Theory, Sensory Gating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review