Cited by 19Disability Education and EmploymentDiscrimination and Equality LawDisability Rights and Representation

The implementation of equality legislation: the case of disabled graduates and reasonable adjustments

William, Laura C.·2016·Industrial Relations Journal

Abstract

Abstract This article explores how reasonable adjustments, part of UK equality legislation, are secured in the workplace, and argues that an implementation gap exists where the impact of the law is weak, despite legal mandates to aid disabled people in employment. The research points to the importance of employers' knowledge of the effects disability as a key determinant of securing workplace adjustments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/irj.12143

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Brown, P; H, Lauder and D, Ashton. (2011), 'The Global Auction.' Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Dickens, L. (2012), Fairer Workplaces: Making Employment Rights Effective. In L. Dickens (Ed.), Making Employment Rights Effective'. (pp.205-228). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  3. Earnshaw, J; M, Marchington and J, Goodman. (2000), '"Unfair to Whom? Discipline and Dismissal in Small Establishments'. Industrial Relations Journal, 31, 62-73.
  4. Edelman, L. (1990), 'Legal Environment and Organisational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace'. The American Journal of Sociology. 104,2, 441476.
  5. Department on Employees' Affective Commitment'. International Journal of Human Resource Management,. 22, 1618-1637.
  6. Purcell, J. (2012), 'Management and Employment Rights'. In L. Dickens (Ed.), Making Employment Rights Effective. (pp.159-182). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  7. Somek, A. (2011), 'Engineering Equality. An Essay on Ant-Discrimination Law'. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
William, L. C.
Affiliations
University of Greenwich (GB)
Corresponding author
William, Laura C.
Venue
Industrial Relations Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-17
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
341-359
ISSN
  • 0019-8692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2338
OpenAlex
W2431338655
Cited by
19
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial Relations Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic Social Research Council (ES/I902023/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
reasonable accommodation, disability discrimination, employment of people with disabilities, equality law, implementation gap, workplace adaptation, British labour law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review