Cited by 27Wound Healing and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsDermatologic Treatments and Research

17β‐Estradiol administration promotes delayed cutaneous wound healing in 40‐week ovariectomised female mice

Open access
Mukai, Kanae, Nakajima, Yukari, Urai, Tamae, Komatsu, Emi, Nasruddin, Sugama, Junko, Nakatani, Toshio·2016·International Wound Journal

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of 17β‐estradiol on wound healing in 40‐week ovariectomised female mice. Thirty‐six‐week‐old female mice were divided into three groups: medication with 17β‐estradiol after ovariectomy (OVX + 17β‐estradiol), ovariectomy (OVX) and sham (SHAM). The mice received two full‐thickness wounds, and the OVX + 17β‐estradiol group was administered 17β‐estradiol at 0·01 g/day until healing. In the OVX + 17β‐estradiol group, the ratio of wound area was significantly smaller than those of the OVX and SHAM groups on days 1–3, 5, 6, 8–12 and 9–12, respectively, the numbers of neutrophils and macrophages were significantly smaller than those on days 3 and 7, the ratio of re‐epithelialisation was significantly higher than those on days 3 and 11, the ratio of myofibroblasts was significantly higher than those on day 11 and smaller on day 14, and the ratio of collagen fibres was significantly larger than that of the OVX group on days 7–14. We found that 17β‐estradiol administration promotes cutaneous wound healing in 40‐week female mice by reducing wound area, shortening inflammatory response, and promoting re‐epithelialisation, collagen deposition and wound contraction. Our results suggest that cutaneous wound healing that is delayed because of ageing is promoted by exogenous and continuous 17β‐estradiol administration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/iwj.12336

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mukai, K., Nakajima, Y., Urai, T., Komatsu, E., Nasruddin, Sugama, J., & Nakatani, T.
Affiliations
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • Department of Clinical Nursing, Graduate Course of Nursing Science, Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences Kanazawa University Kanazawa Japan
Corresponding author
Nakatani, Toshio
Venue
International Wound Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-06
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
636-644
ISSN
  • 1742-4801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-481X
OpenAlex
W1932164140
Cited by
27
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Wound Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • JSPS KAKENHI (22592363, 25293430)
  • Kanazawa University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
estradiol, skin wound healing, delayed wound healing, ovariectomy, aging, re-epithelialization, collagen deposition, myofibroblasts, wound contraction, inflammation, neutrophils, macrophages, female mice
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Animals, Estradiol, Female, Ovariectomy, Skin, Wound Healing, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review