Cited by 4

A confirmatory study on the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane dHACM allograft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled study of 110 patients from 14 wound clinics.

Tettelbach·2019·International Wound Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/iwj.2019.16.issue-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a single-center randomized clinical trial of 16 patients with diabetic foot ulcers at the distal plantar digits, flexor tendon tenotomy resulted in 100% vs 37.5% healing compared with debridement, moisture-retentive dressings, and nonsurgical offloading (P = .03).

    “Flexor tendon tenotomy Surgical procedure for ulcers on the apex of the lesser toes 100% vs 37.5% healing ((P = .03)in a single-center randomized clinical trial of 16 patients with diabetic foot ulcers at the distal plantar digits; flexor”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [60]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tettelbach
Venue
International Wound Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1742-4801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-481X
OpenAlex
W4234931813
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Wound Journal (publishedVersion)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review