The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating Mark-Recapture-Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters
Abstract
In studies of wild animals, one frequently encounters both census and mark-recapture-recovery data. We show how a state-space model for census data in combination with the usual multinomial-based models for ring-recovery data provide estimates of productivity not available from either type of data alone. The approach is illustrated on two British bird species. For the lapwing, we calibrate how its recent decline could be due to a decrease in productivity. For the heron, there is no evidence for a decline in productivity, and the combined analysis increases significantly the strength of logistic regressions of survival on winter severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
Harvey, A. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107049994 · Cited by 4,195
Cited by
Data Integration for Large-Scale Models of Species Distributions
Isaac, N. J. B., Jarzyna, M. A., Keil, P., Dambly, L. I., Boersch-Supan, P. H., Browning, E., Freeman, S. N., Golding, N., Guillera-Arroita, G., Henrys, P. A., et al. (2020) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.006 · Cited by 377
Self-citationState-space models for the dynamics of wild animal populations
Buckland, S. T., Newman, K. B., Thomas, L., & Koesters, N. B. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.08.002 · Cited by 324
Citizens, science and bird conservation
Greenwood, J. J. D. (2007) · Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9 · Cited by 323
Synthesizing multiple data types for biological conservation using integrated population models
Zipkin, E. F., & Saunders, S. P. (2018) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.017 · Cited by 286
The recent past and promising future for data integration methods to estimate species’ distributions
Miller, D. A. W., Pacifici, K., Sanderlin, J. S., & Reich, B. J. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13110 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Besbeas, P., Freeman, S. N., Morgan, B. J. T., & Catchpole, E. A.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 540-547
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071603030
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating Mark-Recapture-Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00540.x
- The paper
- Besbeas, P., Freeman, S. N., Morgan, B. J. T., & Catchpole, E. A. (2002). Integrating Mark-Recapture-Recovery and Census Data to Estimate Animal Abundance and Demographic Parameters. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00540.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
