The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
N‐Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts
Abstract
Summary. Spatial replication is a common theme in count surveys of animals. Such surveys often generate sparse count data from which it is difficult to estimate population size while formally accounting for detection probability. In this article, I describe a class of models (N‐mixture models) which allow for estimation of population size from such data. The key idea is to view site‐specific population sizes, N, as independent random variables distributed according to some mixing distribution (e.g., Poisson). Prior parameters are estimated from the marginal likelihood of the data, having integrated over the prior distribution for N. Carroll and Lombard (1985, Journal of American Statistical Association80, 423–426) proposed a class of estimators based on mixing over a prior distribution for detection probability. Their estimator can be applied in limited settings, but is sensitive to prior parameter values that are fixed a priori. Spatial replication provides additional information regarding the parameters of the prior distribution on N that is exploited by the N‐mixture models and which leads to reasonable estimates of abundance from sparse data. A simulation study demonstrates superior operating characteristics (bias, confidence interval coverage) of the N‐mixture estimator compared to the Caroll and Lombard estimator. Both estimators are applied to point count data on six species of birds illustrating the sensitivity to choice of prior on p and substantially different estimates of abundance as a consequence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS
Royle, J. A., & Nichols, J. D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:eafrpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,364
Self-citation
Cited by
Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics
Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., & Tyack, P. L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12001 · Cited by 746
Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C., Simpson, R., Smith, A., & Packer, C. (2015) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.26 · Cited by 510
Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme
Hua, F., Wang, X., Zheng, X., Fisher, B., Wang, L., Zhu, J., Tang, Y., Yu, D. W., & Wilcove, D. S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12717 · Cited by 416
Multi‐trophic resilience of boreal lake ecosystems to forest fires
Lewis, T. L., Lindberg, M. S., Schmutz, J. A., & Bertram, M. R. (2014) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/13-1170.1 · Cited by 46
Contrasting effects of human settlement on the interaction among sympatric apex carnivores
Penjor, U., Astaras, C., Cushman, S. A., Kaszta, Ż., & Macdonald, D. W. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2681 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Royle, J. A.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-115
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0420
- OpenAlex
- W2155115177
- Cited by
- 1,541
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N‐Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00142.x
- The paper
- Royle, J. A. (2004). N‐Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00142.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.