Multi‐trophic resilience of boreal lake ecosystems to forest fires
Open accessAbstract
Fires are the major natural disturbance in the boreal forest, and their frequency and intensity will likely increase as the climate warms. Terrestrial nutrients released by fires may be transported to boreal lakes, stimulating increased primary productivity, which may radiate through multiple trophic levels. Using a before-after-control-impact (BACI) design, with pre- and postfire data from burned and unburned areas, we examined effects of a natural fire across several trophic levels of boreal lakes, from nutrient and chlorophyll levels, to macroinvertebrates, to waterbirds. Concentrations of total nitrogen and phosphorus were not affected by the fire. Chlorophyll a levels were also unaffected, likely reflecting the stable nutrient concentrations. For aquatic invertebrates, we found that densities of three functional feeding groups did not respond to the fire (filterers, gatherers, scrapers), while two groups increased (shredders, predators). Amphipods accounted for 98% of shredder numbers, and we hypothesize that fire-mediated habitat changes may have favored their generalist feeding and habitat ecology. This increase in amphipods may, in turn, have driven increased predator densities, as amphipods were the most numerous invertebrate in our lakes and are commonly taken as prey. Finally, abundance of waterbird young, which feed primarily on aquatic invertebrates, was not affected by the fire. Overall, ecosystems of our study lakes were largely resilient to forest fires, likel…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algal responses in lakes post-fire were variable, with some lakes experiencing increases and others not.
“Algal responses in lakes post-fire were variable as well, with some lakes experiencing increases and others not (Lewis et al., 2014; McCullough et al., 2019).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Lewis et al., 2014
Only two studies and two reviews discussing littoral invertebrates or zooplankton responses in lakes were identified.
“For lakes, we identified only two studies and two reviews discussing littoral invertebrates or zooplankton responses (Allen et al., 2005; Lewis et al., 2014; McCormick et al., 2010; McCullough et al., 2019).”
From Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management (2022) · cites this paper as Lewis et al., 2014
Cites
The functional role of Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda): shredders, predators, or both?
Kelly, D. W., Dick, J. T. A., & Montgomery, W. I. (2002) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/a:1021370405349 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Effects of wildfire of varying severity on benthic stream insect assemblages and emergence
Malison, R. L., & Baxter, C. V. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/09-022.1 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire effects on aquatic ecosystems: an assessment of the current state of the science
Bixby, R. J., Cooper, S. D., Gresswell, R. E., Brown, L. E., Dahm, C. N., & Dwire, K. A. (2015) · Freshwater Science · doi:10.1086/684073 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., & Leibowitz, S. G. (2022) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr030699 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“Algal responses in lakes post-fire were variable as well, with some lakes experiencing increases and others not (Lewis et al., 2014; McCullough et al., 2019).”
Yellow Perch (<i>Perca flavescens</i>) Mercury Unaffected by Wildland Fires in Northern Minnesota
Riggs, C. E., Kolka, R. K., Nater, E. A., Witt, E. L., Wickman, T. R., Woodruff, L. G., & Butcher, J. T. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2016.10.0418 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lewis, T. L., Lindberg, M. S., Schmutz, J. A., & Bertram, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
- U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center (US)
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis, Tyler L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1253-1263
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1971937452
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- boreal lakes, forest fires, ecosystem resilience, trophic levels, nutrient loading, chlorophyll a, aquatic macroinvertebrates, functional feeding groups, Amphipoda, shredders, aquatic predators, waterbirds, fire disturbance, catchment size, climate change
- MeSH terms
- Chlorophyll A, Animals, Chlorophyll, Feeding Behavior, Fires, Invertebrates, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Population Dynamics, Trees, Ecosystem, Anseriformes, Lakes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review