Cited by 604Economic Growth and ProductivityLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityFirm Innovation and Growth

What’s Driving the New Economy?: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation

Black, Sandra E., Lynch, Lisa M.·2004·The Economic Journal

Abstract

The current economic recession in the United States has challenged the sustainability of the so-called New Economy productivity miracle. This paper introduces the idea that, in addition to investment in information technology, changing workplace organization has been a significant component of the turnaround in productivity growth in the U.S. during the 1990s. Using a nationally representative sample of U.S. businesses surveyed in 1993 and 1996, we examine the relationship between workplace innovations and establishment productivity to assess the potential endurance of strong labor productivity growth into the future. Our work goes beyond measuring the impact of computers on productivity and examines how other types of workplace innovation such as self-managed teams, incentive pay, and employee voice are related to labor productivity. These practices could explain a large part of the movement in multi-factor productivity in the United States over the period 1993-1996. We also show how these results are affected by the union status of a firm. While European countries have invested in varying degrees in information technology, these results suggest additional dimensions to the recent productivity growth in the US that may well have implications for productivity growth potential in Europe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00189.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incentivisation is a common means of mitigating the principal-agent problem by aligning the actions of the agents with the goals of the principals.

    “Incentivisation is a common means of mitigating the principal–agent problem (Arthur and Jelf 1999; Atkinson et al. 1988; Black and Lynch 2004; Mortimer 2008) by aligning the actions of the agents with the goals of the principals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
114
Issue
493
Pages
F97-F116
ISSN
  • 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0297
OpenAlex
W3123320973
Cited by
604
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 20
FWCI
85.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
Keywords
new economy, labor productivity growth, workplace innovation, self-managing teams, performance-based pay, employee voice, IT investment, total factor productivity, union status, work organization, United States, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review