What’s Driving the New Economy?: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation
Abstract
The current economic recession in the United States has challenged the sustainability of the so-called New Economy productivity miracle. This paper introduces the idea that, in addition to investment in information technology, changing workplace organization has been a significant component of the turnaround in productivity growth in the U.S. during the 1990s. Using a nationally representative sample of U.S. businesses surveyed in 1993 and 1996, we examine the relationship between workplace innovations and establishment productivity to assess the potential endurance of strong labor productivity growth into the future. Our work goes beyond measuring the impact of computers on productivity and examines how other types of workplace innovation such as self-managed teams, incentive pay, and employee voice are related to labor productivity. These practices could explain a large part of the movement in multi-factor productivity in the United States over the period 1993-1996. We also show how these results are affected by the union status of a firm. While European countries have invested in varying degrees in information technology, these results suggest additional dimensions to the recent productivity growth in the US that may well have implications for productivity growth potential in Europe.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incentivisation is a common means of mitigating the principal-agent problem by aligning the actions of the agents with the goals of the principals.
“Incentivisation is a common means of mitigating the principal–agent problem (Arthur and Jelf 1999; Atkinson et al. 1988; Black and Lynch 2004; Mortimer 2008) by aligning the actions of the agents with the goals of the principals.”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Black and Lynch 2004
Cites
Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1615 · Cited by 1,848 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1615 · Cited by 1,848 · see citing works
Does Management Matter? Evidence from India *
Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs044 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
What Drives Differences in Management Practices?
Bloom, N., Brynjolfsson, E., Foster, L., Jarmin, R., Patnaik, M., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Van Reenen, J. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20170491 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Hödl, T., & Myrach, T. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00808-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- ORCID
- Lynch, Lisa M.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 493
- Pages
- F97-F116
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0297
- OpenAlex
- W3123320973
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 85.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Keywords
- new economy, labor productivity growth, workplace innovation, self-managing teams, performance-based pay, employee voice, IT investment, total factor productivity, union status, work organization, United States, Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review