Education, Accountability, and the Ethical Demand: Can the Democratic Potential of Accountability Be Regained?
Abstract
This paper analyzes the impact of the idea of accountability on education. It considers the kind of relationships that are promoted or produced by the culture of accountability, both in order to understand what kind of relationships are made possible and to understand what kind of relationships are made difficult, or even impossible, as a result of the accountability regime. The paper explores how the managerial uses of the idea of accountability have become pervasive in contemporary education and how this has changed relationships among students, parents, teachers, and the state. Ultimately, accountability erodes relationships of responsibility. Zygmunt Bauman's “postmodern ethics” is used to gain a detailed understanding of why it has become so much more difficult to develop relationships of responsibility under the accountability regime. Bauman's proposal that we should take responsibility for our responsibility also suggests a starting point from which the democratic potential of accountability might be regained.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As long as the goals and measure of success are set by others and teachers are held to account in relation to these, the scope for teacher agency will be limited.
“As long as the goals and measure of success are set by others and teachers are held to account in relation to these, the scope for teacher agency will be limited.”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Biesta (2004)
Priestley et al (2012) cite Biesta (2004) to argue that accountability is more of a constraint on teacher agency than the prescription of means.
“Priestley et al (2012) cite Biesta (2004) to argue that accountability is more of a constraint on teacher agency than the prescription of means.”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Biesta (2004)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Biesta, G. J. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Biesta, Gert J.J.
- ORCID
- Biesta, Gert J.J.
- Venue
- Educational Theory
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-15
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-250
- ISSN
- 0013-2004 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-5446
- OpenAlex
- W2051416368
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 30.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Theory (publishedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Zygmunt Bauman's Sociology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Keywords
- educational accountability, managerialism, democratic potential, postmodern ethics, Zygmunt Bauman, teacher-student relationship, parent-teacher relationships, ethical demand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review