Cited by 348Zygmunt Bauman's SociologyGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsEducation, Philosophy, and Society

Education, Accountability, and the Ethical Demand: Can the Democratic Potential of Accountability Be Regained?

Biesta, Gert J.J.·2004·Educational Theory

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of the idea of accountability on education. It considers the kind of relationships that are promoted or produced by the culture of accountability, both in order to understand what kind of relationships are made possible and to understand what kind of relationships are made difficult, or even impossible, as a result of the accountability regime. The paper explores how the managerial uses of the idea of accountability have become pervasive in contemporary education and how this has changed relationships among students, parents, teachers, and the state. Ultimately, accountability erodes relationships of responsibility. Zygmunt Bauman's “postmodern ethics” is used to gain a detailed understanding of why it has become so much more difficult to develop relationships of responsibility under the accountability regime. Bauman's proposal that we should take responsibility for our responsibility also suggests a starting point from which the democratic potential of accountability might be regained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0013-2004.2004.00017.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As long as the goals and measure of success are set by others and teachers are held to account in relation to these, the scope for teacher agency will be limited.

    “As long as the goals and measure of success are set by others and teachers are held to account in relation to these, the scope for teacher agency will be limited.”
  • Priestley et al (2012) cite Biesta (2004) to argue that accountability is more of a constraint on teacher agency than the prescription of means.

    “Priestley et al (2012) cite Biesta (2004) to argue that accountability is more of a constraint on teacher agency than the prescription of means.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biesta, G. J. J.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Biesta, Gert J.J.
Venue
Educational Theory
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-15
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
233-250
ISSN
  • 0013-2004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-5446
OpenAlex
W2051416368
Cited by
348
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 20
FWCI
30.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Theory (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Zygmunt Bauman's Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
Keywords
educational accountability, managerialism, democratic potential, postmodern ethics, Zygmunt Bauman, teacher-student relationship, parent-teacher relationships, ethical demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review