The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EVOLUTION OF POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION: ACCUMULATING DOBZHANSKY-MULLER INCOMPATIBILITIES
Abstract
Hybrid sterility and inviability often result from the accumulation of substitutions that, while functional on their normal genetic backgrounds, cause a loss of fitness when brought together in hybrids. Previous theory has shown that such Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities should accumulate at least as fast as the square of the number of substitutions separating two species, the so-called snowball effect. Here we explicitly describe the stochastic accumulation of these incompatibilities as a function of time. The accumulation of these incompatibilities involves three levels of stochasticity: (1) the number of substitutions separating two allopatric lineages at a given time; (2) the number of incompatibilities resulting from these substitutions; and (3) the fitness effects of individual incompatibilities. Previous analyses ignored the stochasticity of molecular evolution (level 1) as well as that due to the variable effects of incompatibilities (level 3). Here we approximate the full stochastic process characterizing the accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities between pairs of loci. We derive the distribution of the number of incompatibilities as a function of divergence time between allopatric taxa as well as the distribution of waiting times to speciation by postzygotic isolation. We provide simple approximations for the mean and variance of these waiting times. These results let us estimate. albeit crudely, the probability, p, that two diverged sites from different species will contribute to hybrid sterility or inviability. Our analyses of data from Drosophila and Bombina suggest that p is generally very small, on the order of 10(-6) or less.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Dobzhansky, T. (1936) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/21.2.113 · Cited by 732
Estimating Divergence Times in the Presence of an Overdispersed Molecular Clock
Cutler, D. J. (2000) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026264 · Cited by 86 · cited 1×
“First, our analysis, together with the Palm-Kintchine theorem, implies that the speciation clock may be more reliable than molecular data from a small number of (coding) loci, which often show appreciable departures from the Poisson expectation R 5 1 (Gillespie 1991, ch. 3; Cutler 2000).”
Method
Cited by
The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans
Sankararaman, S., Mallick, S., Dannemann, M., Prüfer, K., Kelso, J., Pääbo, S., Patterson, N., & Reich, D. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12961 · Cited by 1,107
Todesco, M., Pascual, M. A., Owens, G. L., Ostevik, K. L., Moyers, B. T., Hübner, S., Heredia, S. M., Hahn, M. A., Caseys, C., Bock, D. G., et al. (2016) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12367 · Cited by 867
PERSPECTIVE: MODELS OF SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?
Gavrilets, S. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00233.x · Cited by 587
Uncovering cryptic genetic variation
Gibson, G., & Dworkin, I. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1426 · Cited by 546
Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes
Schumer, M., Xu, C., Powell, D. L., Durvasula, A., Skov, L., Holland, C., Blazier, J. C., Sankararaman, S., Andolfatto, P., Rosenthal, G. G., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3684 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Orr, H. A., & Turelli, M.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1085-1094
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2130102027
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION: ACCUMULATING DOBZHANSKY-MULLER INCOMPATIBILITIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00628.x
- The paper
- Orr, H. A., & Turelli, M. (2001). THE EVOLUTION OF POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION: ACCUMULATING DOBZHANSKY-MULLER INCOMPATIBILITIES. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00628.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.