The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HYBRID POPULATIONS SELECTIVELY FILTER GENE INTROGRESSION BETWEEN SPECIES
Abstract
Hybrids have long been recognized as a potential pathway for gene flow between species that can have important consequences for evolution and conservation biology. However, few studies have demonstrated that genes from one species can introgress or invade another species over a broad geographic area. Using 35 genetically mapped restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers of two species of cottonwoods (Populus fremontii x P. angustifolia) and their hybrids (n = 550 trees), we showed that the majority of the genome is prohibited from introgressing from one species into the other. However, this barrier was not absolute; Fremont cpDNA and mtDNA were found throughout the geographic range of narrowleaf cottonwood, and 20% of the nuclear markers of Fremont cottonwood introgressed varying distances (some over 100 km) into the recipient species' range. Rates of nuclear introgression were variable, but two nuclear markers introgressed as fast as the haploid, cytoplasmically inherited chloroplast and mitochondrial markers. Our genome-wide analysis provides evidence for positive, negative, and neutral effects of introgression. For example, we predict that DNA fragments that introgress through several generations of backcrossing will be small, because small fragments are less likely to contain deleterious genes. These results argue that recombination will be important, that introgression can be very selective, and that evolutionary forces within the hybrid population to effectively "filter" gene flow between species. A strong filter may make introgression adaptive, prevent genetic assimilation, lead to relaxed isolating mechanisms, and contribute to the stability of hybrid zones. Thus, rather than hybridization being a negative factor as is commonly argued, natural hybridization between native species may provide important genetic variation that impacts both ecological and evolutionary processes. Finally, we propose two hypotheses that contrast the likelihood of contemporary versus ancient introgression in this system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553 · Cited by 2,882
Natural Hybridization and Evolution
Arnold, M. L. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195099744.001.0001 · Cited by 1,785
Natural hybridization and evolution
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0883 · Cited by 1,742
The role of hybridization in evolution
Barton, N. H. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x · Cited by 1,603
OXFORD SURVEYS IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Allendorf, F. W. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02584.x · Cited by 1,449
Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones
Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/341497a0 · Cited by 1,101
Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process.
Futuyma, D. J., Shapiro, L. H., & Harrison, R. G. (1995) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2410309 · Cited by 860
Anderson, E. (1949) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.4553 · Cited by 838
Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants.
Rieseberg, L. H., & Soltis, P. S. (1991) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 775
Hybridization and the Extinction of Rare Plant Species
Levin, D. A., Francisco‐Ortega, J., & Jansen, R. K. (1996) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010010.x · Cited by 654
Cited by
THE HIDDEN SIDE OF INVASIONS: MASSIVE INTROGRESSION BY LOCAL GENES
Currat, M., Ruedi, M., Petit, R. J., & Excoffier, L. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00413.x · Cited by 816
LEAKY PREZYGOTIC ISOLATION AND POROUS GENOMES: RAPID INTROGRESSION OF MATERNALLY INHERITED DNA
Chan, K. M. A., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01748.x · Cited by 342
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinsen, G. D., Whitham, T. G., Turek, R. J., & Keim, P.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1325-1335
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2121024603
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HYBRID POPULATIONS SELECTIVELY FILTER GENE INTROGRESSION BETWEEN SPECIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00655.x
- The paper
- Martinsen, G. D., Whitham, T. G., Turek, R. J., & Keim, P. (2001). HYBRID POPULATIONS SELECTIVELY FILTER GENE INTROGRESSION BETWEEN SPECIES. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00655.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.