The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MATING SYSTEMS, SPERM COMPETITION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BIRDS
Abstract
Comparative analyses suggest that a variety of factors influence the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. We analyzed the relative importance of social mating system and sperm competition to sexual differences in plumage and body size (mass and tail and wing length) of more than 1,000 species of birds from throughout the world. In these analyses we controlled for phylogeny and a variety of ecological and life-history variables. We used testis size (corrected for total body mass) as an index of sperm competition in each species, because testis size is correlated with levels of extrapair paternity and is available for a large number of species. In contrast to recent studies, we found strong and consistent effects of social mating system on most forms of dimorphism. Social mating system strongly influenced dimorphism in plumage, body mass, and wing length and had some effect on dimorphism in tail length. Sexual dimorphism was relatively greater in species with polygynous or lekking than monogamous mating systems. This was true when we used both species and phylogenetically independent contrasts for analysis. Relative testis size was also related positively to dimorphism in tail and wing length, but in most analyses it was a poorer predictor of plumage dimorphism than social mating system. There was no association between relative testis size and mass dimorphism. Geographic region and life history were also associated with the four types of dimorphism, although their influence varied between the different types of dimorphism. Although there is much interest in the effects of sperm competition on sexual dimorphism, we suggest that traditional explanations based on social mating systems are better predictors of dimorphism in birds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
(1907) · The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Tokyo · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,892
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
Walker, E. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488486 · Cited by 8,538
Andersson, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207278 · Cited by 7,401
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,931
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Systematics and the Origin of Species: On Ernst Mayr's 100th Anniversary
(2005) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/11310 · Cited by 3,454
Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa
Cramp, S. (1977) · Cited by 3,275
Grafen, A. (1989) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1989.0106 · Cited by 2,142
The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex, Vol 1.
Darwin, C. (1871) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.1037/12293-000 · Cited by 1,912
Cited by
A COMPARATIVE TEST OF ADAPTIVE HYPOTHESES FOR SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN LIZARDS
Cox, R. M., Skelly, S. L., & John-Alder, H. B. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00371.x · Cited by 398
The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration
Dale, J., Dey, C. J., Delhey, K., Kempenaers, B., & Valcu, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15509 · Cited by 391
The neural mechanisms and circuitry of the pair bond
Walum, H., & Young, L. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0072-6 · Cited by 353
Colour polymorphism in birds: causes and functions
Galeotti, P., Rubolini, D., Dunn, P. O., & Fasola, M. (2003) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00569.x · Cited by 354
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, P. O., Whittingham, L. A., & Pitcher, T. E.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-175
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2175064082
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MATING SYSTEMS, SPERM COMPETITION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BIRDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01281.x
- The paper
- Dunn, P. O., Whittingham, L. A., & Pitcher, T. E. (2001). MATING SYSTEMS, SPERM COMPETITION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BIRDS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01281.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.