The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EVOLUTION OF F1POSTZYGOTIC INCOMPATIBILITIES IN BIRDS
Open accessAbstract
We analyzed the rate at which postzygotic incompatibilities accumulate in birds. Our purposes were to assess the role of intrinsic F1 hybrid infertility and inviability in the speciation process, and to compare rates of loss of fertility and viability between the sexes. Among our sample more than half the crosses between species in the same genus produce fertile hybrids. Complete loss of F1 hybrid fertility takes on the order of millions of years. Loss of F1 hybrid viability occurs over longer timescales than fertility: some viable hybrids have been produced between taxa that appear to have been separated for more than 55 my. There is strong support for Haldane's rule, with very few examples where the male has lower fitness than the female. However, in contrast to Drosophila, fertility of the homogametic sex in the F1 appears to be lost before viability of the heterogametic sex in the F1. We conclude that the time span of loss of intrinsic hybrid fertility and viability is often, but not always, longer than the time to speciation. Premating isolation is an important mechanism maintaining reproductive isolation in birds. In addition, other factors causing postzygotic reproductive isolation such as ecological causes of hybrid unfitness, reduced mating success of hybrids, and genetic incompatibilities in the F2s and backcrosses may often be involved in the speciation process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies
Strimmer, K., & von Haeseler, A. (1996) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025664 · Cited by 2,531
Phylogeny and Classification of the Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution
Sibley, C. G., & Ahlquist, J. E. (1991) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1xp3v3r · Cited by 1,769
Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world
Sibley, C. G., & Monroe, B. L. (1990) · Yale University Press eBooks · Cited by 1,660
PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04233.x · Cited by 1,305
LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?
Rice, W. R., & Hostert, E. E. (1993) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01257.x · Cited by 1,016
Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5054.193 · Cited by 820
Coyne, J. A. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355511a0 · Cited by 797
“PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA” REVISITED
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (1997) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02412.x · Cited by 743
The Importance of Recent Ice Ages in Speciation: A Failed Paradigm
Klicka, J., & Zink, R. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5332.1666 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
Quantitative criteria for species delimitation
TOBIAS, J. A., SEDDON, N., SPOTTISWOODE, C. N., PILGRIM, J. D., FISHPOOL, L. D. C., & COLLAR, N. J. (2010) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2010.01051.x · Cited by 1,092
The Role of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data
Servedio, M. R., & Noor, M. A. F. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412 · Cited by 939
Speciation in birds: Genes, geography, and sexual selection
Edwards, S. V., Kingan, S. B., Calkins, J. D., Balakrishnan, C. N., Jennings, W. B., Swanson, W. J., & Sorenson, M. D. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0501846102 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, T. D., & BOUVIER, M. M.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2083-2089
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W3022896472
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF F1POSTZYGOTIC INCOMPATIBILITIES IN BIRDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00133.x
- The paper
- Price, T. D., & BOUVIER, M. M. (2002). THE EVOLUTION OF F1POSTZYGOTIC INCOMPATIBILITIES IN BIRDS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00133.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.