The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA
Open accessAbstract
To investigate the time course of speciation, we gathered literature data on 119 pairs of closely related Drosophila species with known genetic distances, mating discrimination, strength of hybrid sterility and inviability, and geographic ranges. Because genetic distance is correlated with divergence time, these data provide a cross-section of taxa at different stages of speciation. Mating discrimination and the sterility or inviability of hybrids increase gradually with time. Hybrid sterility and inviability evolve at similar rates. Among allopatric species, mating discrimination and postzygotic isolation evolve at comparable rates, but among sympatric species strong mating discrimination appears well before severe sterility or inviability. This suggests that prezygotic reproductive isolation may be reinforced when allopatric taxa become sympatric. Analysis of the evolution of postzygotic isolation shows that recently diverged taxa usually produce sterile or inviable male but not female hybrids. Moreover, there is a large temporal gap between the evolution of male-limited and female hybrid sterility or inviability. This gap, which is predicted by recent theories about the genetics of speciation, explains the overwhelming preponderance of hybridizations yielding male-limited hybrid sterility or inviability (Haldane's rule).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The molecular clock runs more slowly in man than in apes and monkeys
Li, W.-H., & Tanimura, M. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326093a0 · Cited by 375
Research works printed but not linked: 82
- Ayala F. J., 1975, Genetic differentiation during the speciation process, Evol. Biol., 8, 1
- Ayala F. J., 1974, A new subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Pan‐Pac. Entomol., 50, 211
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108367 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108367
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1974.tb00723.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1974.tb00723.x
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1974.tb00791.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1266/jjg.55.177 · doi:10.1266/jjg.55.177
- 10.1071/BI9780197 · doi:10.1071/bi9780197
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-6977-0_3 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6977-0_3
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1957.tb02899.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1957.tb02899.x
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1949.tb00031.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1949.tb00031.x
- 10.1016/0169-5347(87)90193-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60093-0 · doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60093-0
- Cariou M. L.1988.Biochemical phylogeny of the eight species in theDrosophila melanogastersubgroup includingD. sechelliaandD. orena.Genet. Res.In press.
- 10.1086/282975 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/259395a0 · DOI
- 10.1086/284701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1974.tb00781.x · DOI
- Coyne J. A., 1989, Speciation and Its Consequences
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1974.tb00792.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1974.tb00792.x
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04670.x · DOI
- Crow J. F., 1942, Cross fertility and isolating mechanisms in the Drosophila mulleri group, Univ. Texas Publ., 4228, 53
- David J., 1974, Hybridation d'une nouvelle espéce Drosophila mauritiana avec D. melanogaster et D. simulans, Ann. Genét., 17, 235
- Dobzhansky Th, 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species
- 10.1086/282833 · doi:10.1086/282833
- 10.1016/0003-3472(68)90114-0 · DOI
- Dobzhansky Th., 1957, Drosophila insularis, a new sibling species of the willistoni group, Univ. Texas Publ., 5721, 39
- Dobzhansky Th., 1938, An experimental study of sexual isolation in Drosophila, Biol. Zentralblatt, 58, 589
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb03322.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb03322.x
- Ehrman L., 1982, The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, 193
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · DOI · Paper page
- Futch D. G., 1966, A study of speciation in South Pacific populations of Drosophila ananassae, Univ. Texas Publ., 6615, 79
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1973.tb00692.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1973.tb00692.x
- Gillespie J. H., 1988, Molecular evolution and the neutral allele theory, Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol., 4, 10
- Gray A. P., 1954, Mammalian Hybrids
- Gray A. P., 1958, Bird Hybrids
- 10.1007/BF02983075 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00215.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00215.x
- 10.1093/aesa/62.2.388 · doi:10.1093/aesa/62.2.388
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05684.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05684.x
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00954.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511623486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03257.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03257.x
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1961.tb03170.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1961.tb03170.x
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-0931-4_4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-8321-9 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-8321-9
- 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1976.tb00696.x · doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1976.tb00696.x
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05034.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.1976.0046 · doi:10.1098/rspb.1976.0046
- MacIntyre R. J., 1986, The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, 39
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01694.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01694.x
- Maynard Smith J., 1978, The Evolution of Sex
- 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00433.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1950.tb00047.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1950.tb00047.x
- Miller D. D., 1971, Some additional data and a summary on interspecific mating in the D. affinis subgroup, Dros. Inf. Serv., 46, 98
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03404.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03404.x
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb00134.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb00134.x
- Nair P. S., 1971, Isozyme variations and evolutionary relationships in the mesophragmatica species group of Drosophila, Univ. Texas Publ., 7103, 17
- 10.1086/282771 · DOI · Paper page
- Nei M., 1975, Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02908.x · DOI · Paper page
- Patterson J. T., 1947, Sexual isolation in the mulleri subgroup, Univ. Texas Publ., 4720, 32
- Patterson J. T., 1947, The insemination reaction and its bearing on the problem of speciation in the mulleri subgroup, Univ. Texas Publ., 4720, 41
- Patterson J. T., 1952, Revision of the montana complex of the virilis species group, Univ. Texas Publ., 5204, 20
- Patterson J. T., 1947, Sexual isolation between members of the virilis group of species, Univ. Texas Publ., 4720, 7
- Patterson J. T., 1949, The relationship of novamexicana to other members of the virilis group, Univ. Texas Publ., 4920, 7
- 10.1093/genetics/72.1.143 · doi:10.1093/genetics/72.1.143
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00244.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00244.x
- Rogers J. S., 1972, Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance, Univ. Texas Publ., 7213, 145
- Sokal R. R., 1981, Biometry
- 10.1086/284557 · doi:10.1086/284557
- Sturtevant A. H., 1929, The genetics of Drosophila simulans, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ., 399, 1
- 10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.000323 · DOI · Paper page
- Throckmorton L. H., 1982, The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, 227
- 10.1007/BF00120265 · doi:10.1007/bf00120265
- Wasserman M., 1982, The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, 61
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01073.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01073.x
- 10.1126/science.205.4409.906 · doi:10.1126/science.205.4409.906
- 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04820.x · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/105.1.71 · doi:10.1093/genetics/105.1.71
- Yang S. Y., 1972, Isozyme variations and phylogenetic relationships in the Drosophila bipectinanta species complex, Univ. Texas Publ., 7213, 213
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1973.tb00709.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1973.tb00709.x
Cited by
Ecology and the origin of species
Schluter, D. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02198-x · Cited by 1,878
The Role of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data
Servedio, M. R., & Noor, M. A. F. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412 · Cited by 939
Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species
Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A., & Reiland, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.221274498 · Cited by 911
HOW CLOSELY CORRELATED ARE MOLECULAR AND QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF GENETIC VARIATION? A META-ANALYSIS
Reed, D. H., & Frankham, R. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00629.x · Cited by 803
Sobel, J. M., Chen, G. F., Watt, L. R., & Schemske, D. W. (2010) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00877.x · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 362-381
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W1983315411
- Cited by
- 1,305
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 10318 d)
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (GM 32221, 38462)
- National Science Foundation (BSR 18558)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04233.x
- The paper
- Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (1989). PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04233.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.