The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MINOR QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI UNDERLIE FLORAL TRAITS ASSOCIATED WITH MATING SYSTEM DIVERGENCE IN MIMULUS
Abstract
The genetic basis of species differences provides insight into the mode and tempo of phenotypic divergence. We investigate the genetic basis of floral differences between two closely related plant taxa with highly divergent mating systems, Mimulus guttatus (large-flowered outcrosser) and M. nasutus (small-flowered selfer). We had previously constructed a framework genetic linkage map of the hybrid genome containing 174 markers spanning approximately 1800 cM on 14 linkage groups. In this study, we analyze the genetics of 16 floral, reproductive, and vegetative characters measured in a large segregating M. nasutus x M. guttatus F2 population (N = 526) and in replicates of the parental lines and F1 hybrids. Phenotypic analyses reveal strong genetic correlations among floral traits and epistatic breakdown of male and female fertility traits in the F2 hybrids. We use multitrait composite interval mapping to jointly locate and characterize quantitative trait loci (QTLs) underlying interspecific differences in seven floral traits. We identified 24 floral QTLs, most of which affected multiple traits. The large number of QTLs affecting each trait (mean = 13, range = 11-15) indicates a strikingly polygenic basis for floral divergence in this system. In general, QTL effects are small relative to both interspecific differences and environmental variation within genotypes, ruling out QTLs of major effect as contributors to floral divergence between M. guttatus and M. nasutus. QTLs show no pattern of directional dominance. Floral characters associated with pollinator attraction (corolla width) and self-pollen deposition (stigma-anther distance) share several pleiotropic or linked QTLs, but unshared QTLs may have allowed selfing to evolve independently from flower size. We discuss the polygenic nature of divergence between M. nasutus and M. guttatus in light of theoretical work on the evolution of selfing, genetics of adaptation, and maintenance of variation within populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,666
Lander, E. S., Green, P., Abrahamson, J., Barlow, A., Daly, M. J., Lincoln, S. E., & Newburg, L. (1987) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3 · Cited by 6,656
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623486 · Cited by 6,347
Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.
Lander, E. S., & Botstein, D. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/121.1.185 · Cited by 5,235
Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping.
Churchill, G. A., & Doerge, R. W. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/138.3.963 · Cited by 4,935
Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.
Zeng, Z. B. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457 · Cited by 3,182
THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS
Lande, R., & Schemske, D. W. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb04077.x · Cited by 1,648
A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation
Haldane, J. B. S. (1927) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100015644 · Cited by 1,326
EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS
Husband, B. C., & Schemske, D. W. (1996) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04472.x · Cited by 1,200
Cited by
Rieseberg, L. H., & Willis, J. H. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137729 · Cited by 1,040
Self-citationGenomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae
Turner, T. L., Hahn, M. W., & Nuzhdin, S. V. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030285 · Cited by 734
The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants
Lowry, D. B., Modliszewski, J. L., Wright, K. M., Wu, C. A., & Willis, J. H. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0064 · Cited by 496
Self-citationSpeciation and introgression between Mimulus nasutus and Mimulus guttatus
Brandvain, Y., Kenney, A. M., Flagel, L., Coop, G., & Sweigart, A. L. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004410 · Cited by 259
RAPID EVOLUTION CAUSED BY POLLINATOR LOSS IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS: RAPID EVOLUTION AFTER POLLINATOR LOSS
Bodbyl Roels, S. A., & Kelly, J. K. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01326.x · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishman, L., Kelly, A. J., & Willis, J. H.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2138-2155
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W1981455906
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MINOR QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI UNDERLIE FLORAL TRAITS ASSOCIATED WITH MATING SYSTEM DIVERGENCE IN MIMULUS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00139.x
- The paper
- Fishman, L., Kelly, A. J., & Willis, J. H. (2002). MINOR QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI UNDERLIE FLORAL TRAITS ASSOCIATED WITH MATING SYSTEM DIVERGENCE IN MIMULUS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00139.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.