The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CONVERGENCE WITH MULTIVARIATE DATA: MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CONVERGENCE AMONG HERBIVOROUS LIZARDS
Abstract
Despite its importance to evolutionary theory, convergence remains an understudied phenomenon and is usually investigated using qualitative data. This paper advances a new, multidimensional view of convergence. Three patterns indicative of convergence are discussed, and techniques to discover and test convergent patterns in a quantitative framework are developed. These concepts and methods are applied to a dataset of digitized coordinates on 1554 lizard skulls and 1292 lower jaws to test hypotheses of convergence among herbivorous lizards. Encompassing seven independent acquisitions of herbivory, this lizard sample provides an ideal natural experiment for exploring ideas of convergence among different systems (here, morphological and functional). Three related questions are addressed: (1) Do herbivorous lizards show evidence of convergence in skull and lower jaw morphology? (2) What, if any, is the morphospace pattern associated with this convergence? (3) Is it possible to predict the direction of convergence using functional models? Relative warp analysis and permutation tests reveal that the skulls and lower jaws of herbivorous lizards do show evidence of convergence. Herbivore skulls deviate from their carnivorous or omnivorous sister groups toward the same area of morphospace. Without a phylogenetic perspective, this pattern would not be recognizable. Lower jaws of herbivores are not convergent in morphology but are convergent in function: herbivores deviate away from their carnivorous sister groups toward higher values of mechanical advantage. These results illustrate the desirability of quantitative methods, informed by phylogenetic information, in the study of convergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Cited by
Functional versus morphological diversity in macroevolution
Wainwright, P. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095706 · Cited by 373
The origin and early radiation of dinosaurs
Brusatte, S. L., Nesbitt, S. J., Irmis, R. B., Butler, R. J., Benton, M. J., & Norell, M. A. (2010) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.04.001 · Cited by 305
The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors
Bright, J. A., Marugán-Lobón, J., Cobb, S. N., & Rayfield, E. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602683113 · Cited by 258
The molecular basis of phenotypic convergence
Rosenblum, E. B., Parent, C. E., & Brandt, E. E. (2014) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091851 · Cited by 256
Pierce, S. E., Angielczyk, K. D., & Rayfield, E. J. (2008) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.10627 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Stayton, C. T.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 824-841
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2175952296
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CONVERGENCE WITH MULTIVARIATE DATA: MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CONVERGENCE AMONG HERBIVOROUS LIZARDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01160.x
- The paper
- Stayton, C. T. (2006). TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CONVERGENCE WITH MULTIVARIATE DATA: MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CONVERGENCE AMONG HERBIVOROUS LIZARDS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01160.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.