The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fragmented landscapes, road mortality and patch connectivity: modelling influences on the dispersal of Eurasian lynx
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Although many reintroduction schemes for the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in Germany have been discussed, the implications of connectivity between suitable patches have not been assessed. We introduce an individual‐based, spatially explicit dispersal model to assess the probability of a dispersing animal reaching another suitable patch in the complex heterogeneous German landscape, with its dense transport system. The dispersal model was calibrated using telemetric data from the Swiss Jura and based on a map of potential lynx dispersal habitat. Most suitable patches could be interconnected by movements of dispersing lynx within 10 years of reintroduction. However, when realistic levels of mortality risks on roads were applied, most patches become isolated except along the German–Czech border. Consequently, patch connectivity is limited not so much by the distribution of dispersal habitat but by the high mortality of dispersing lynx. Accordingly, rather than solely investing in habitat restoration, management efforts should try to reduce road mortality. Synthesis and applications. Our approach illustrates how spatially explicit dispersal models can guide conservation efforts and reintroduction programmes even where data are scarce. Clear limits imposed by substantial road mortality will affect dispersing lynx as well as other large carnivores, unless offset by careful road‐crossing management or by the careful selection of release points in reintroduction programmes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Saura, S., & Rubio, L. (2010) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05760.x · Cited by 558
Validation of functional connectivity modeling: The Achilles’ heel of landscape connectivity mapping
Laliberté, J., & St-Laurent, M.-H. (2020) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103878 · Cited by 86
Kaszta, Ż., Cushman, S. A., Hearn, A. J., Burnham, D., Macdonald, E. A., Goossens, B., Nathan, S. K. S. S., & Macdonald, D. W. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.001 · Cited by 70
Large Gaps in Canopy Reduce Road Crossing by a Gliding Mammal
van der Ree, R., Cesarini, S., Sunnucks, P., Moore, J. L., & Taylor, A. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03759-150435 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- KRAMER‐SCHADT, S., REVILLA, E., WIEGAND, T., & BREITENMOSER, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-19
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 711-723
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2123085028
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.