CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 86

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of functional connectivity modeling: The Achilles’ heel of landscape connectivity mapping

Laliberté, Jérôme, St-Laurent, Martin-Hugues·2020·Landscape and Urban Planning
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103878
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103878

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. Adriaensen, 2003, The application of ‘least-cost’modelling as a functional landscape model, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 233, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Albert, 2017, Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change, Conservation Biology, 31, 1383, 10.1111/cobi.12943 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Algeo, 2017, Modeling raccoon (Procyon lotor) habitat connectivity to identify potential corridors for rabies spread, Tropical Medicine and Infections Disease, 2, 1
  4. Awade, 2008, Using gap-crossing capacity to evaluate functional connectivity of two Atlantic rainforest birds and their response to fragmentation, Australian Ecology, 33, 863, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01857.x · DOI
  5. Ayram, 2017, Anthropogenic impact on habitat connectivity: A multidimensional human footprint index evaluated in a highly biodiverse landscape of Mexico, Ecological Indicators, 72, 895, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.007 · DOI
  6. Baguette, 2007, Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: Functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal, Landscape Ecology, 22, 1117, 10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4 · DOI
  7. Ballard, 1999, Predation and survival of white-tailed deer fawns in northcentral New Brunswick, Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 574, 10.2307/3802645 · DOI
  8. Beier, 1998, Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?, Conservation Biology, 12, 1241, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.98036.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Beier, 2008, Forks in the road: Choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages, Conservation Biology, 22, 836, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bélisle, 2005, Measuring landscape connectivity: The challenge of behavioral landscape ecology, Ecology, 86, 1988, 10.1890/04-0923 · DOI
  11. Bishara, 2012, Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: Comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches, Psychological Methods, 17, 399, 10.1037/a0028087 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Boer, 1988, Mortality rates of moose in New Brunswick: A life table analysis, Journal of Wildlife Management, 51, 21, 10.2307/3801051 · DOI
  13. Bond, 2017, A multi-method approach to delineate and validate migratory corridors, Landscape Ecology, 32, 1705, 10.1007/s10980-017-0537-4 · DOI
  14. Buderman, 2018, Large-scale movement behavior in a reintroduced predator population, Ecography, 41, 126, 10.1111/ecog.03030 · DOI
  15. Calabrese, J. M., & Fagan, W. F. (2004). A comparison‐shopper's guide to connectivity metrics.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2(10), 529-536. doi - 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Chetkiewicz, 2009, Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors, Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 1036, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01686.x · DOI
  17. Coulon, 2004, Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: An individual–based approach, Molecular ecology, 13, 2841, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02253.x · DOI
  18. Creel, 2005, Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves, Ecology, 86, 3387, 10.1890/05-0032 · DOI · Paper page
  19. D'Eon, 2002, Landscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape, Conservation Ecology, 6, 10, 10.5751/ES-00436-060210 · DOI
  20. Dupras, 2016, The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region, Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 61, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.005 · DOI
  21. Dussault, 2005, Linking moose habitat selection to limiting factors, Ecography, 28, 619, 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04263.x · DOI
  22. Dussault, 2005, Space use of moose in relation to food availability, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 1431, 10.1139/z05-140 · DOI
  23. Etherington, 2016, Least-cost modelling and landscape ecology: Concepts, applications, and opportunities, Current Landscape Ecology Reports., 1, 40, 10.1007/s40823-016-0006-9 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fahrig, 2007, Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes, Functional Ecology, 21, 1003, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01326.x · DOI
  25. FitzGibbon, 2007, The importance of functional connectivity in the conservation of a ground-dwelling mammal in an urban Australian landscape, Landscape Ecology, 22, 1513, 10.1007/s10980-007-9139-x · DOI
  26. Ford, 2009, Comparison of methods of monitoring wildlife crossing-structures on highways, Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 1213
  27. Fryxell, 1988, Population dynamics of Newfoundland moose using cohort analysis, Journal of Wildlife Management, 52, 14, 10.2307/3801050 · DOI
  28. Galpern, 2011, Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation, Biological Conservation, 144, 44, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gangadharan, 2017, Planning connectivity at multiple scales for large mammals in a human-dominated biodiversity hotspot, Journal for Nature Conservation, 36, 38, 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.02.003 · DOI
  30. Grafius, 2017, A bird’s eye view: Using circuit theory to study urban landscape connectivity for birds, Landscape Ecology, 32, 1771, 10.1007/s10980-017-0548-1 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hofman, 2018, Enhancing conservation network design with graph-theory and a measure of protected area effectiveness: Refining wildlife corridors in Belize, Central America, Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 51, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.013 · DOI
  32. Hothorn, 2012, Large-scale model-based assessment of deer-vehicle collision risk, PLoS ONE, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0029510 · DOI
  33. Hurst, 2008, Evaluation of shifts in white-tailed deer winter yards in the Adirondack region of New York, Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 367
  34. Kays, R., Kranstauber, B., Jansen, P., Carbone, C., Rowcliffe, M., Fountain, T., & Tilak, S. (2009). 2011. Camera traps as sensor networks for monitoring animal communities. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Wireless Sensor Networks, 1(2), 19-29.
  35. Keitt, 1997, Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes, Conservation Ecology, 1, 1, 10.5751/ES-00015-010104 · DOI
  36. Keeley, 2017, Habitat suitability is a poor proxy for landscape connectivity during dispersal and mating movements, Landscape and Urban Planning, 161, 90, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Keeley, 2016, Estimating landscape resistance from habitat suitability: Effects of data source and nonlinearities, Landscape Ecology, 31, 2151, 10.1007/s10980-016-0387-5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Khosravi, 2018, Multispecies assessment of core areas and connectivity of desert carnivores in central Iran, Diversity and Distributions, 24, 193, 10.1111/ddi.12672 · DOI
  39. Koenig, 2018, Generalizing matrix structure affects the identification of least-cost paths and patch connectivity, Theoretical Ecology, 11, 95, 10.1007/s12080-017-0351-2 · DOI
  40. Kramer-Schadt, 2004, Fragmented landscapes, road mortality and patch connectivity: Modelling influences on the dispersal of Eurasian lynx, Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 711, 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00933.x · DOI
  41. Laliberté, 2020, In the wrong place at the wrong time: Moose and deer movement patterns influence wildlife-vehicle collision risk, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 135, 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105365 · DOI
  42. Latham, 2015, The GPS craze: Six questions to address before deciding to deploy GPS technology on wildlife, New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 39, 143
  43. Leblond, 2010, What drives fine-scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose, Ecography, 33, 1102, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06104.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. Leblond, 2011, Assessing the influence of resource covariates at multiple spatial scales: An application to forest-dwelling caribou faced with intensive human activity, Landscape Ecology, 26, 1433, 10.1007/s10980-011-9647-6 · DOI
  45. Leblond, 2015, Low-density spruce plantations increase foraging by moose in a northeastern temperate forest, Forest Ecology and Management, 347, 228, 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.034 · DOI
  46. Lechner, 2017, Characterising landscape connectivity for conservation planning using a dispersal guild approach, Landscape Ecology, 32, 99, 10.1007/s10980-016-0431-5 · DOI
  47. Lesage, 2000, Seasonal home range size and philopatry in two northern white-tailed deer populations, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 1930, 10.1139/z00-117 · DOI
  48. Lesmerises, 2018, Spatiotemporal response of mountain caribou to the intensity of backcountry skiing, Biological Conservation, 217, 149, 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.030 · DOI
  49. Liu, 2018, Using cross-scale landscape connectivity indices to identify key habitat resource patches for Asian elephants in Xishuangbanna, China, Landscape and Urban Planning, 171, 80, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.017 · DOI
  50. Long, 2010, Influence of roads, rivers, and mountains on natal dispersal of white-tailed deer, Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 1242, 10.2193/2009-096 · DOI
  51. Long, 2005, Forest cover influences dispersal distance of white-tailed deer, Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 623, 10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[623:FCIDDO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  52. Long, 2008, Multiple proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in white-tailed deer, Behavioral Ecology, 19, 1235, 10.1093/beheco/arn082 · DOI
  53. Loro, 2015, Ecological connectivity analysis to reduce the barrier effect of roads. An innovative graph-theory approach to define wildlife corridors with multiple paths and without bottlenecks, Landscape and Urban Planning, 139, 149, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.006 · DOI
  54. Lundmark, C., & Ball, J. P. (2008). Living in snowy environments: quantifying the influence of snow on moose behavior.Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research,40(1), 111-118. doi - 10.1657/1523-0430(06-103)[LUNDMARK]2.0.CO;2. · DOI
  55. Lyra-Jorge, 2008, Comparing methods for sampling large-and medium-sized mammals: Camera traps and track plots, European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54, 739, 10.1007/s10344-008-0205-8 · DOI
  56. Marrotte, 2017, Functional connectivity of the white-footed mouse in Southern Quebec, Canada, Landscape Ecology, 32, 1987, 10.1007/s10980-017-0559-y · DOI
  57. McClure, 2016, Connecting models to movements: Testing connectivity model predictions against empirical migration and dispersal data, Landscape Ecology, 31, 1419, 10.1007/s10980-016-0347-0 · DOI · Paper page
  58. McLoughlin, 2005, Relating predation mortality to broad-scale habitat selection, Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 701, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00967.x · DOI
  59. McRae, B. H., & Beier, P. (2007). Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,104(50), 19885-19890. doi - 10.1073pnas.0706568104. · DOI · Paper page
  60. Merrick, 2017, Circuit theory to estimate natal dispersal routes and functional landscape connectivity for an endangered small mammal, Landscape Ecology, 32, 1163, 10.1007/s10980-017-0521-z · DOI
  61. Michel, 2018, Weather and landscape factors affect white-tailed deer neonate survival at ecologically important life stages in the Northern Great Plains, PLoS ONE, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0195247 · DOI
  62. Milanesi, 2017, Three-dimensional habitat structure and landscape genetics: A step forward in estimating functional connectivity, Ecology, 98, 393, 10.1002/ecy.1645 · DOI
  63. Moilanen, 2011, On the limitations of graph-theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation, Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 1543, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02062.x · DOI · Paper page
  64. Moore, J. A., Tallmon, D. A., Nielsen, J., & Pyare, S. (2011). Effects of the landscape on boreal toad gene flow: does the pattern–process relationship hold true across distinct landscapes at the northern range margin?Molecular Ecology,20(23), 4858-4869. doi - 0.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05313.x. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Moqanaki, 2017, All roads lead to Iran: Predicting landscape connectivity of the last stronghold for the critically endangered Asiatic cheetah, Animal Conservation, 20, 29, 10.1111/acv.12281 · DOI
  66. Morelli, 2017, Climate change refugia and habitat connectivity promote species persistence, Climate Change Responses, 4, 1, 10.1186/s40665-017-0036-5 · DOI
  67. Naidoo, 2018, Evaluating the effectiveness of local-and regional-scale wildlife corridors using quantitative metrics of functional connectivity, Biological Conservation, 217, 96, 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.037 · DOI
  68. Palmer, 2011, Introducing a ‘stochastic movement simulator’for estimating habitat connectivity, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 258, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00073.x · DOI
  69. Penczykowski, 2014, Habitat structure and ecological drivers of disease, Limnology and Oceanography, 59, 340, 10.4319/lo.2014.59.2.0340 · DOI
  70. Peterman, 2018, ResistanceGA: An R package for the optimization of resistance surfaces using genetic algorithms, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 1638, 10.1111/2041-210X.12984 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Polfus, 2011, Identifying indirect habitat loss and avoidance of human infrastructure by northern mountain woodland caribou, Biological Conservation, 144, 2637, 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.023 · DOI
  72. Porter, 2004, Movement behavior, dispersal, and the potential for localized management of deer in a suburban environment, Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 247, 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0247:MBDATP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  73. Pullinger, 2010, Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: Evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information, Landscape Ecology, 25, 1547, 10.1007/s10980-010-9526-6 · DOI
  74. Rayfield, 2010, The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values, Landscape Ecology, 25, 519, 10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Rea, 2018, Dash Cam videos on YouTube™ offer insights into factors related to moose-vehicle collisions, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 118, 207, 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.020 · DOI
  76. Renjifo, 2001, Effect of natural and anthropogenic landscape matrices on the abundance of subandean bird species, Ecological Applications, 11, 14, 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0014:EONAAL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  77. Roever, 2013, Functional connectivity within conservation networks: Delineating corridors for African elephants, Biological Conservation, 157, 128, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.025 · DOI
  78. Rowcliffe, 2011, Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: An adapted distance sampling approach, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 464, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00094.x · DOI
  79. Rowcliffe, 2008, Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition, Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 1228, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01473.x · DOI
  80. Sabine, 2002, Migration behavior of white-tailed deer under varying winter climate regimes in New Brunswick, Journal of Wildlife management, 66, 718, 10.2307/3803137 · DOI
  81. Simberloff, 1992, Movement corridors: Conservation bargains or poor investments?, Conservation Biology, 6, 493, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040493.x · DOI
  82. Smolko, 2018, Why do migrants move downhill? The effects of increasing predation and density on red deer altitudinal migration in temperate Carpathian forests, Mammal Research, 63, 297, 10.1007/s13364-018-0355-3 · DOI
  83. Steffan-Dewenter, 2002, Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds, Ecology, 83, 1421, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Taylor, 1993, Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure, Oikos, 571, 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Thurfjell, 2015, Avoidance of high traffic levels results in lower risk of wild boar-vehicle accidents, Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 98, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.015 · DOI
  86. Tischendorf, 2000, On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity, Oikos, 90, 7, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x · DOI
  87. Tobler, 2008, An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large-and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals, Animal Conservation, 11, 169, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00169.x · DOI
  88. Uezu, 2005, Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species, Biological Conservation, 123, 507, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.001 · DOI
  89. Urban, 2001, Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective, Ecology, 82, 1205, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  90. Van Beest, 2010, Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore, Journal of Animal Ecology, 79, 910, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01701.x · DOI
  91. Vasudev, 2015, From dispersal constraints to landscape connectivity: Lessons from species distribution modeling, Ecography, 38, 967, 10.1111/ecog.01306 · DOI
  92. Vogt, 2009, Mapping functional connectivity, Ecological Indicators, 9, 64, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.011 · DOI
  93. Walpole, 2012, Functional connectivity of lynx at their southern range periphery in Ontario, Canada, Landscape Ecology, 27, 761, 10.1007/s10980-012-9728-1 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Wheatley, 2009, Factors limiting our understanding of ecological scale, Ecological Complexity, 6, 150, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.10.011 · DOI
  95. Whittaker, 1999, Effect of coyote predation on early fawn survival in sympatric deer species, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 27, 256
  96. Willson, 2004, Loss of habitat connectivity hinders pair formation and juvenile dispersal of chucao tapaculos in Chilean rainforest, The Condor, 106, 166, 10.1093/condor/106.1.166 · DOI
  97. Zeller, 2014, Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: Pumas as a case study, Landscape Ecology, 29, 541, 10.1007/s10980-014-9991-4 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Zeller, 2016, Using step and path selection functions for estimating resistance to movement: Pumas as a case study, Landscape Ecology, 31, 1319, 10.1007/s10980-015-0301-6 · DOI
  99. Zeller, 2018, Are all data types and connectivity models created equal? Validating common connectivity approaches with dispersal data, Diversity and Distributions, 24, 868, 10.1111/ddi.12742 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laliberté, J., & St-Laurent, M.-H.
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
202
Pages
103878
ISSN
0169-2046
DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103878
Cited by
86
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review