Cited by 249Deception detection and forensic psychologyEmployer Branding and e-HRMPersonality Traits and Psychology

Looking Good and Lying to Do It: Deception as an Impression Management Strategy in Job Interviews

Weiss, Brent, Feldman, Robert S.·2006·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

The present study investigated job applicants' use of deception. The study examined applicants' deception on written applications, as well as in a job interview; whether individuals would lie to conform to job requirements; and whether extraversion and self‐monitoring are related to lying. Fifty‐nine candidates completed an application and interview. After the interview, candidates were informed that they were actually participating in an experiment. They then watched a videotape of their interview and indicated any lies they told. As hypothesized, it was found that applicants lied both on the job applications and during the interview, primarily to appear to conform to job requirements. Furthermore, candidate extraversion was positively correlated with number of lies told, although self‐monitoring was unrelated to lying.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00055.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, B., & Feldman, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
1070-1086
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W1510393856
Cited by
249
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
deception, impression management, job interviews, job applications, lying, extraversion, self-monitoring, job applicants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review