Looking Good and Lying to Do It: Deception as an Impression Management Strategy in Job Interviews
Abstract
The present study investigated job applicants' use of deception. The study examined applicants' deception on written applications, as well as in a job interview; whether individuals would lie to conform to job requirements; and whether extraversion and self‐monitoring are related to lying. Fifty‐nine candidates completed an application and interview. After the interview, candidates were informed that they were actually participating in an experiment. They then watched a videotape of their interview and indicated any lies they told. As hypothesized, it was found that applicants lied both on the job applications and during the interview, primarily to appear to conform to job requirements. Furthermore, candidate extraversion was positively correlated with number of lies told, although self‐monitoring was unrelated to lying.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insiders have an impression management goal.
“Hence, insiders have an impression management goal (L. H. Colwell et al., 2006; Weiss & Feldman, 2006).”
From Sorting Insiders From Co-Workers: Remote Synchronous Computer-Mediated Triage for Investigating Insider Attacks (2024) · cites this paper as Weiss & Feldman, 2006
Cites
Self-Presentation and Verbal Deception: Do Self-Presenters Lie More?
Feldman, R. S., Forrest, J. A., & Happ, B. R. (2002) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/153248302753674848 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Words Sweat: Identifying Signals for Loan Default in the Text of Loan Applications
Netzer, O., Lemaire, A., & Herzenstein, M. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243719852959 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Dando, C. J., Taylor, P. J., Menacere, T., Ormerod, T. C., Ball, L. J., & Sandham, A. L. (2024) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211068292 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Hence, insiders have an impression management goal (L. H. Colwell et al., 2006; Weiss & Feldman, 2006).”
Background
- Authors
- Weiss, B., & Feldman, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1070-1086
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W1510393856
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- deception, impression management, job interviews, job applications, lying, extraversion, self-monitoring, job applicants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review