Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,009

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature

Open access
MOLES, ANGELA T., WESTOBY, MARK·2004·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Large‐seeded species have long been known to have higher survivorship during establishment than small‐seeded species. Here, we assessed the size of this advantage by compiling published data on survival through seedling emergence, seedling establishment and sapling establishment. We found no relationship between seed mass and survival through the transition from viable seed in or on the soil to newly emerged seedlings (P = 0.47, n = 33 species). Synthesis of data from experimental studies on the advantages of large‐seeded species establishing under particular hazards (such as shade, drought or herbivory) confirmed that seedlings of large‐seeded species perform better than those of small‐seeded species in most situations. However, the magnitude of this advantage was not sufficient to counterbalance the greater number of seeds produced by small‐seeded species m−2 of canopy outline year−1. Synthesis of data from field studies of populations under natural conditions also showed that large‐seeded species have higher survival through early seedling establishment than small‐seeded species (P = 0.006, n = 112 species). However, the magnitude of this advantage would only be sufficient to counterbalance the greater number of seeds produced by small‐seeded species m−2 of canopy outline year−1 if mortality continued at the same rate for some time. The time required for a species with 10‐fold larger seeds to recoup the advantage gained by a smaller‐seeded species during seed production ranged from 8.8 weeks for the smallest seeded species in the data set, up to an implausible 4.2 years for the largest‐seeded species. Thus, while large‐seeded species do have a survival advantage over small‐seeded species during seedling establishment, the available evidence suggests that advantages must also accrue during other stages in the life cycle. One possibility is that the greater seed production of small‐seeded species (m−2 of canopy outline year−1) is partly offset by larger canopies and longer reproductive life spans in large‐seeded species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,009

Metadata

Authors
MOLES, A. T., & WESTOBY, M.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-13
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
372-383
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2131516675
Cited by
1,009
References
0
FWCI
21.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x
The paper
MOLES, A. T., & WESTOBY, M. (2004). Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.