The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Large‐seeded species have long been known to have higher survivorship during establishment than small‐seeded species. Here, we assessed the size of this advantage by compiling published data on survival through seedling emergence, seedling establishment and sapling establishment. We found no relationship between seed mass and survival through the transition from viable seed in or on the soil to newly emerged seedlings (P = 0.47, n = 33 species). Synthesis of data from experimental studies on the advantages of large‐seeded species establishing under particular hazards (such as shade, drought or herbivory) confirmed that seedlings of large‐seeded species perform better than those of small‐seeded species in most situations. However, the magnitude of this advantage was not sufficient to counterbalance the greater number of seeds produced by small‐seeded species m−2 of canopy outline year−1. Synthesis of data from field studies of populations under natural conditions also showed that large‐seeded species have higher survival through early seedling establishment than small‐seeded species (P = 0.006, n = 112 species). However, the magnitude of this advantage would only be sufficient to counterbalance the greater number of seeds produced by small‐seeded species m−2 of canopy outline year−1 if mortality continued at the same rate for some time. The time required for a species with 10‐fold larger seeds to recoup the advantage gained by a smaller‐seeded species during seed production ranged from 8.8 weeks for the smallest seeded species in the data set, up to an implausible 4.2 years for the largest‐seeded species. Thus, while large‐seeded species do have a survival advantage over small‐seeded species during seedling establishment, the available evidence suggests that advantages must also accrue during other stages in the life cycle. One possibility is that the greater seed production of small‐seeded species (m−2 of canopy outline year−1) is partly offset by larger canopies and longer reproductive life spans in large‐seeded species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rainfall seasonality predicts the germination behavior of a tropical dry‐forest vine
Martins, A. A., Opedal, Ø. H., Armbruster, W. S., & Pélabon, C. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5108 · Cited by 16
van Rosmalen, S. J., Homberger, J.-M., Riksen, M. J. P. M., & Limpens, J. (2025) · Journal of Coastal Conservation · doi:10.1007/s11852-025-01101-5 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- MOLES, A. T., & WESTOBY, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-13
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 372-383
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2131516675
- Cited by
- 1,009
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x
- The paper
- MOLES, A. T., & WESTOBY, M. (2004). Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.