The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
Open accessAbstract
Summary: This paper studies the effect of institutions on trade flows, using a gravity model approach. Standard gravity equations incorporate factors such as geographical proximity, language, trade policy and common history as explanatory factors for variation in bilateral trade that reflect the costs of trade across geographical and cultural distance. We extend this type of analysis by focusing on the relevance of the quality of governance and the extent of familiarity with the resulting framework of rules and norms in explaining variation in bilateral trade patterns. More specifically, we test whether institutional homogeneity and institutional quality have an independent impact on the trade volume between pairs of countries. We find that having a similar institutional framework promotes bilateral trade by 13%, on average. Furthermore, a better quality of formal institutions tends to coincide with more trade. Depending on being either importer or exporter, an increase in overall institutional quality of one standard deviation from the mean leads to an estimated increase of 30–44% in bilateral trade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001 · Cited by 4,788 · cited 1×
“Amongst others, studies by Helpman and Krugman (1985) and Deardorff (1998) show that both new trade theories of product differentiation as well as the classical Heckscher-Ohlin theory of comparative advantage can provide a theoretical rationale for the gravity model of bilateral trade.”
Background
Cited by
Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?*
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1095 · Cited by 1,922
On the role of domestic trade flows for estimating the gravity model of trade
Yotov, Y. V. (2022) · Contemporary Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/coep.12567 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- De Groot, H. L. F., Linders, G., Rietveld, P., & Subramanian, U.
- Venue
- Kyklos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-123
- ISSN
- 0023-5962 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6435
- OpenAlex
- W3023107764
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00245.x
- The paper
- De Groot, H. L. F., Linders, G., Rietveld, P., & Subramanian, U. (2004). The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns. Kyklos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00245.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.