The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“New” Mainstream SLA Theory: Expanded and Enriched
Abstract
How have the ideas raised by Firth and Wagner (1997) influenced the construction of second language acquisition (SLA) theories? In this article, we take the position that prior to and since 1997, there was and has been a notable increase in SLA research and theory that prioritizes sociocultural and contextual factors in addition to acknowledging individual agency and multifaceted identities. This article focuses on 4 major influences on a growing body of SLA research: sociocultural theory of mind, situated learning, poststructural theories, and dialogism. We highlight aspects of these perspectives that have been used in SLA theory, and provide examples of research that illustrate the richness and complexity of constructs such as languaging, legitimate peripheral participation, subjectivity, and heteroglossia. These perspectives and constructs address Firth and Wagner's call for a reconceptualization of SLA by offering alternative understandings of language and language learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research
Engeström, Y. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139814744 · Cited by 4,991
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing
CANALE, M. (1980) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1 · Cited by 4,021
Cited by
Identity and a Model of Investment in Applied Linguistics
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190514000191 · Cited by 1,186
Identity, language learning, and social change
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000309 · Cited by 1,168
“What Do You Want to Say?” How Adolescents Use Translanguaging to Expand Learning Opportunities
Martin-Beltrán, M. (2014) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2014.914372 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- SWAIN, M., & DETERS, P.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-29
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 820-836
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160452362
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 107.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “New” Mainstream SLA Theory: Expanded and Enriched. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2007.00671.x
- The paper
- SWAIN, M., & DETERS, P. (2007). “New” Mainstream SLA Theory: Expanded and Enriched. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2007.00671.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.