The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density estimation in live‐trapping studies
Abstract
Unbiased estimation of population density is a major and unsolved problem in animal trapping studies. This paper describes a new and general method for estimating density from closed‐population capture–recapture data. Many estimators exist for the size (N) and mean capture probability ( p̄) of a closed population. These statistics suffer from an unknown bias due to edge effect that varies with trap layout and home range size. The mean distance between successive captures of an individual ( ) provides information on the scale of individual movements, but is itself a function of trap spacing and grid size. Our aim is to define and estimate parameters that do not depend on the trap layout. In the new method, simulation and inverse prediction are used to estimate jointly the population density (D) and two parameters of individual capture probability, magnitude (g 0 ) and spatial scale (σ), from the information in , p̄ and . The method uses any configuration of traps (e.g. grid, web or line) and any choice of closed‐population estimator. It is assumed that home ranges have a stationary distribution in two dimensions, and that capture events may be simulated as the outcome of competing Poisson processes in time. The method is applied to simulated and field data. The estimator appears unusually robust and free from bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters.
Cormack, R. M., & Seber, G. A. F. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531423 · Cited by 3,289
Analysis and Management of Animal Populations
Grand, J. B., Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D., & Conroy, M. J. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802722 · Cited by 2,671
Estimating the Population Size for Capture-Recapture Data with Unequal Catchability
Chao, A. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531532 · Cited by 2,450
Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., & Anderson, D. R. (1978) · Wildlife Monographs · Cited by 2,442
Distance Sampling-Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.
Sprent, P., Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & Laake, J. L. (1994) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404172 · Cited by 1,855
Statistical Inference for Capture-Recapture Experiments.
Lawson, A. B., Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C., & Hines, J. E. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532321 · Cited by 1,836
The ecology of arboreal folivores.
Montgomery, G. G. (1978) · Cited by 1,422
The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters
Jolly, G. M., & Seber, G. A. F. (1974) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3397 · Cited by 1,416
Turchin, P. (1998) · Sinauer Associates eBooks · Cited by 1,333
Distance Sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations
Buckland, S. T. (1993) · Cited by 1,249
Cited by
Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics
Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., & Tyack, P. L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12001 · Cited by 746
Using simulation to compare methods for estimating density from capture–recapture data
Ivan, J. S., White, G. C., & Shenk, T. M. (2013) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/12-0102.1 · Cited by 57
Lindsø, L. K., Dupont, P., Rød-Eriksen, L., Andersskog, I. P. Ø., Ulvund, K. R., Flagstad, Ø., Bischof, R., & Eide, N. E. (2022) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-021-05087-3 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Efford, M.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-16
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 598-610
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2150009594
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density estimation in live‐trapping studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13043.x
- The paper
- Efford, M. (2004). Density estimation in live‐trapping studies. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13043.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.